2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.06.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence of selected zoonotic and vector-borne agents in dogs and cats in Costa Rica

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
21
4
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
8
21
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar observations have been reported in several surveys undertaken among dogs and cats worldwide (Inpankaew et al 2007, Lorenzini et al 2007, Papazahariadou et al 2007, Traub et al 2008, Scorza et al 2011. The high prevalence of hookworm infections among dogs and cats in these rural communities could play a significant role in contributing to the occurrence of zoonotic ancylostomiasis such as creeping eruption and eosinophilic enteritis (EE) or less frequently symptoms of localized myositis, erythema multiforme and ophthalmological manifestations in human (Bowman et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Similar observations have been reported in several surveys undertaken among dogs and cats worldwide (Inpankaew et al 2007, Lorenzini et al 2007, Papazahariadou et al 2007, Traub et al 2008, Scorza et al 2011. The high prevalence of hookworm infections among dogs and cats in these rural communities could play a significant role in contributing to the occurrence of zoonotic ancylostomiasis such as creeping eruption and eosinophilic enteritis (EE) or less frequently symptoms of localized myositis, erythema multiforme and ophthalmological manifestations in human (Bowman et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…However, similar distribution of Cryptosporidium has been described in cats and dogs elsewhere. For example parasitological study of stool samples from cats and dogs in Ontario, Canada, showed a high overall positivity rate in samples from both dogs (40%) and cats (36.6%) (Shukla et al, 2006) while in a study in Costa Rica 75% of dogs and 67% of cats were found to be infected (Scorza et al, 2011). In the present study we also found that cats were less infected than dogs (32 and 44% respectively).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Fortunately, all the samples from cats and wastewater in the study were negative of Cryptosporidium spp., but the zoonotic species such as C. parvum and C. felis have been found in some studies [5,16], and in addition, more and more studies were involved in the water quality with this parasite including China, and different species and genotypes have been identified [17][18][19].…”
Section: The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to raise awareness that domestic animals may harbor zoonotic parasites such as Cryptosporidium asymptomatically. Infection of Cryptosporidium in dogs and cats has been reported in some countries, including the hostadapted and zoonotic Cryptosporidium canis infected in dogs from Japan [2] and Canada [3], Cryptosporidium parvum in dogs from Germany [4] and Costa Rica [5], and in cats from other countries [4,5]. The host-adapted and zoonotic Cryptosporidium felis has been reported in cats from USA [6] as well as a report of a mixed infection in a cat involving Cryptosporidium muris and Cryptosporidium felis [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%