2010
DOI: 10.1002/smll.200901673
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preventing Nanoscale Wear of Atomic Force Microscopy Tips Through the Use of Monolithic Ultrananocrystalline Diamond Probes

Abstract: Nanoscale wear is a key limitation of conventional atomic force microscopy (AFM) probes that results in decreased resolution, accuracy, and reproducibility in probe-based imaging, writing, measurement, and nanomanufacturing applications. Diamond is potentially an ideal probe material due to its unrivaled hardness and stiffness, its low friction and wear, and its chemical inertness. However, the manufacture of monolithic diamond probes with consistently shaped small-radius tips has not been previously achieved.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
82
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
2
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This includes coatings for high-performance tools 4 , hard-disks 5,6 , microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) 7 , automotive and aerospace components 8,9 , and atomic force microscope probes 10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes coatings for high-performance tools 4 , hard-disks 5,6 , microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) 7 , automotive and aerospace components 8,9 , and atomic force microscope probes 10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several over-coated nanodevices have been proposed to mitigate conductive tip coating, including platinum silicide tips [10], silicon dioxide tip encapsulation [11], silicon carbide tips [12] and diamond or diamond-like carbon tips [13,14]. However, noble metal-coated conductive tips exhibit disadvantages, narrow potential window or electrode fouling when applied in electrochemical nanodevices [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We resolve worn volumes as small as 25±5 nm 3 , a factor of 10 3 lower than alternative techniques [10,11]. Wear of silicon against diamond is consistent with atomic attrition, and inconsistent with fracture or plastic deformation, which we explicitly rule out by direct imaging.…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Fundamental insights from individual nanoscale contacts are crucial for understanding wear at larger length-scales [2], and for enabling reliable nanoscale devices, manufacturing, and microscopy. Observed nanoscale wear mechanisms include fracture [3] and plastic deformation [4], but recent experiments [5][6][7] and simluations [8] propose another mechanism: wear via atom-by-atom removal ("atomic attrition") modeled using stress-assisted chemical reaction kinetics. Experimental evidence for this has so far been inferential.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%