2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.08.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preventing postpartum hemorrhage after cesarean delivery: a network meta-analysis of available pharmacologic agents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A network meta-analysis of accessible pharmacological drugs, which comprised 46 trials and 7368 people, contradicts our results. There was a clinically insignificant quantity of blood loss (54.83 mL; 95 percent confidence interval, 26.48-143.78) in favour of carbotocin over oxytocin, but this difference was not statistically significant [18].…”
Section: Table (1)mentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A network meta-analysis of accessible pharmacological drugs, which comprised 46 trials and 7368 people, contradicts our results. There was a clinically insignificant quantity of blood loss (54.83 mL; 95 percent confidence interval, 26.48-143.78) in favour of carbotocin over oxytocin, but this difference was not statistically significant [18].…”
Section: Table (1)mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…According to a network meta-analysis of 46 trials and 7368 people, our findings are incorrect. Just 54.83 mL of predicted blood loss (95 percent confidence range: 26,48-143.78) was shown to be superior than oxytocin, which is clinically insignificant [18].…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Interestingly, results of initial studies and the first meta-analysis stated that there remained some uncertainty as to the effectiveness of carbetocin 1 but with the growing number of studies, the difference became more obvious and at least 2 recent metaanalyses showed a benefit in favor of carbetocin. 2,3 So, How Can One Explain the Present Results?…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Additionally, to our knowledge, there are no cost-effectiveness analyses that directly compared intravenous carbetocin with rectal misoprostol for prevention of PPH during vaginal delivery, and this represents an important focus for future research. Among patients undergoing cesarean delivery, a network meta-analysis of RCTs depicted that carbetocin (not misoprostol) was the most effective uterotonic agent in decreasing postpartum blood loss [ 35 ]. Moreover, among patients undergoing vaginal delivery, a network meta-analysis by Gallos et al [ 36 ] showed that carbetocin was more effective and more costly than all other uterotonic agents including misoprostol.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%