1988
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0434.1988.tb01014.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevention of Bacterial Wilt of Grasses by Phylloplane Bacteria

Abstract: Various chromogenic bacteria were isolated from the mowing site in natural and sown meadows and in pastures. Their abihty to protect young ryegrass plants from wilt by simultaneous inoculation with Xanthomonas campestris pv. graminis was tested under low concentrations of the parasite inoculum. From about 200 isolates tested 35 % had a very high protective effect, 45 % a moderate one, and only 20 % had no significant effect. Mixtures of different species of phylloplane bacteria usually gave very good protectio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The idea of using this non-pathogenic strain to protect plants from disease is logical. In previous experiments (Schmidt, 1988), avirulent X.C. graminis showed a protective effect at least as efficient as the best strains of Pseudomonas Juorescens or other phylloplane bacteria.…”
Section: 'Premunition' Of Plantsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The idea of using this non-pathogenic strain to protect plants from disease is logical. In previous experiments (Schmidt, 1988), avirulent X.C. graminis showed a protective effect at least as efficient as the best strains of Pseudomonas Juorescens or other phylloplane bacteria.…”
Section: 'Premunition' Of Plantsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Importance of temperature in disease epidemics has also been reported for another pathovar of X. campestris (3). Additionally, the colonization and infection of plants by a pathogen can be suppressed by antagonistic microbes such as non-pathogenic phyllosphere bacteria (9,13,14). Popu lations of X campestris pv.…”
Section: Days After the 1st Applicationmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In severe cases, the plants die within a few days after inoculation. Since treatments with antibiotics are undesired in forage production, and both the disinfection of mowing equipment and induced systemic resistance with epiphytic bacteria have not yielded satisfactory results (Schmidt, 1988), resistance breeding is currently the only applicable and accepted measure to prevent substantial yield losses. So far, resistance breeding programmes have been based on artificial seedling inoculation in the greenhouse and targeted recurrent phenotypic selection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%