1995
DOI: 10.1056/nejm199511163332001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease with Pravastatin in Men with Hypercholesterolemia

Abstract: Treatment with pravastatin significantly reduced the incidence of myocardial infarction and death from cardiovascular causes without adversely affecting the risk of death from noncardiovascular causes in men with moderate hypercholesterolemia and no history of myocardial infarction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

57
3,465
10
151

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6,970 publications
(3,683 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
57
3,465
10
151
Order By: Relevance
“…The transition to utilizing absolute risk to determine statin allocation is evidence based because absolute risk has been shown to be a much stronger predictor of ASCVD events compared with LDL‐C levels, and the cardiovascular benefit of statin therapy in randomized controlled trials has largely been independent of baseline LDL‐C 17, 18, 19, 20, 21. A recent study from a large Midwestern cohort of patients who experienced ST‐segment– elevation myocardial infarction demonstrated further evidence supporting a risk‐based approach to statin allocation as application of the ACC/AHA guidelines, compared with ATP III guidelines, doubled the prevalence of pre‐ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction statin eligibility, with 39% of the cohort statin eligible before ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction by ATP III compared with 79% being statin eligible with application of ACC/AHA guidelines 22…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transition to utilizing absolute risk to determine statin allocation is evidence based because absolute risk has been shown to be a much stronger predictor of ASCVD events compared with LDL‐C levels, and the cardiovascular benefit of statin therapy in randomized controlled trials has largely been independent of baseline LDL‐C 17, 18, 19, 20, 21. A recent study from a large Midwestern cohort of patients who experienced ST‐segment– elevation myocardial infarction demonstrated further evidence supporting a risk‐based approach to statin allocation as application of the ACC/AHA guidelines, compared with ATP III guidelines, doubled the prevalence of pre‐ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction statin eligibility, with 39% of the cohort statin eligible before ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction by ATP III compared with 79% being statin eligible with application of ACC/AHA guidelines 22…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pharmacological agents are currently available that have a profound e ect on lowering serum LDL cholesterol concentrations with generally minimal adverse reactions. 101,102 Goal of therapeutic intervention…”
Section: Serum Hdl Cholesterolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dyslipidemia, particularly elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), increases the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%