Abstract:This study was undertaken to determine if intensive dietary therapy, home blood glucose monitoring, and the selective use of insulin can be effective in preventing fetal macrosomia. All patients were screened at 24 to 28 weeks' gestation using a modification of O'Sullivan's criteria. The 153 patients diagnosed as gestational diabetics by the study protocol were placed on a 1800 to 2000 Kcal American Diabetes Association diet and taught home glucose monitoring. Insulin therapy was initiated only if blood glucos… Show more
“…The largest randomized trial to evaluate a 30% reduction in estimated energy needs included approximately 60 women in each group, but found no differences in perinatal outcomes, including infant morbidities and birth weight [37]. "Intensive dietary therapy" (defined by investigators as 1800 to 2000 kcal in the ADA diet) in one study of women with GDM reported macrosomia rates similar to a reference population [38].…”
Section: Evidence For Efficacy Of Calorie Restriction In Obese Gdmmentioning
The goals of medical nutrition therapy for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are to meet the maternal and fetal nutritional needs, as well as to achieve and maintain optimal glycemic control. Nutrition requirements during pregnancy are similar for women with and without GDM. The American Diabetes Association and the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology recommend nutrition therapy for GDM that emphasizes food choices to promote appropriate weight gain and normoglycemia without ketonuria, and moderate energy restriction for obese women. Current controversies in GDM nutrition therapy involve manipulation of dietary composition (amounts and types of carbohydrates and fats), gestational weight gain, and energy and carbohydrate restriction. Randomized controlled trials are needed to determine which dietary compositions and patterns promote normoglycemia as well as optimal maternal and infant outcomes. Until better evidence is available, nutrition therapy will remain a cornerstone of GDM management with potential benefits that cannot be fully realized in clinical practice.
“…The largest randomized trial to evaluate a 30% reduction in estimated energy needs included approximately 60 women in each group, but found no differences in perinatal outcomes, including infant morbidities and birth weight [37]. "Intensive dietary therapy" (defined by investigators as 1800 to 2000 kcal in the ADA diet) in one study of women with GDM reported macrosomia rates similar to a reference population [38].…”
Section: Evidence For Efficacy Of Calorie Restriction In Obese Gdmmentioning
The goals of medical nutrition therapy for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are to meet the maternal and fetal nutritional needs, as well as to achieve and maintain optimal glycemic control. Nutrition requirements during pregnancy are similar for women with and without GDM. The American Diabetes Association and the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology recommend nutrition therapy for GDM that emphasizes food choices to promote appropriate weight gain and normoglycemia without ketonuria, and moderate energy restriction for obese women. Current controversies in GDM nutrition therapy involve manipulation of dietary composition (amounts and types of carbohydrates and fats), gestational weight gain, and energy and carbohydrate restriction. Randomized controlled trials are needed to determine which dietary compositions and patterns promote normoglycemia as well as optimal maternal and infant outcomes. Until better evidence is available, nutrition therapy will remain a cornerstone of GDM management with potential benefits that cannot be fully realized in clinical practice.
“…The selected time frame of the investigation rested upon the knowledge that basic principles of currently prevailing management patterns for the diagnosis and treatment of diabetes in pregnancy had been well established in America by the mid-1980's [20][21][22]. It was felt feasible therefore to define minimum standards of practice that could reasonably be considered applicable for all study years.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…b) Among babies of diabetic mothers approximately 50% are born macrosomic [22], as compared to about 10% in the general population [15]. c) The rate of ≥4000 g birth weights has been estimated as 20% among borderline glucose intolerant mothers [20,21]. d) Birth weights of ≥4500 g are about 10-times more frequent among infants of diabetic than those of non-diabetic women [30].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above findings necessitated an unattractive conclusion, namely that protection of babies from injuries required expansion of indications for elective abdominal delivery. Since effective diabetic control is known to reduce the risk of excessive fetal growth [20][21][22], and because the latter is widely considered a very important predisposing factor for shoulder dystocia [1,2,9,12], evaluation of the potential role of antenatal care in the prevention of neurological birth damage appeared a logical next step in the authors' research program.…”
AbstractThe study explores the roles of routine prenatal diabetic screening and control in the occurrence of neurological birth injuries associated with shoulder dystocia. The investigation involved retrospective review of 226 medical records that contained information about the antenatal events in cases that resulted in permanent neonatal injuries following arrest of the shoulders at delivery. Close attention was paid to diabetic screening and management of mothers with evidence of glucose intolerance. Analysis of the records revealed that one-third of all women, including those with predisposing factors, received no diabetic screening during pregnancy. The majority of confirmed diabetic patients were not treated adequately. Among babies of diabetic women, birth weights exceeding 4500 g were about 30-fold more frequent than among those with normal glucose tolerance. The data suggest that universal screening and rigid diabetic control, including mothers with borderline glucose tolerance, are effective measures for the prevention of excessive fetal growth and intrapartum complications deriving from it. If ignored, impaired maternal glucose tolerance may become a major predisposing factor for neurological birth injuries. It appears therefore that with routine screening for diabetic predisposition and effective control of gestational diabetes the risk of fetal damage can be reduced substantially.
“…Dieser Anteil erstreckt sich von weniger als 30 % [2,14,32,37,44,53,111,118,123] über 30 ± 50% [14,17,32,35,62,69,107,108,123] und sogar auf 50 ± 100 % der Fälle [4,17,29,54,69,70,74,76,88].…”
Section: Indikationen Zur Insulinbehandlungunclassified
ZusammenfassungFragestellung: Bei Gestationsdiabetes (GDM) entwickeln rund 10 ± 20 % der Feten einen Hyperinsulinismus. Da dieser alle frü-hen und späten kindlichen Komplikationen verursacht, ist eine aggressive Insulintherapie nur bei fetalem Hyperinsulinismus erforderlich. Für die Indikation zur Insulinbehandlung bestehen keine einheitlichen Richtlinien. Sie erfolgt nach internistischen Gesichtspunkten anhand der mütterlichen Glykämie und/oder nach geburtshilflichen Gesichtspunkten als prophylaktische Insulintherapie, oder nach fetalen Parametern wie Makrosomie oder dem Fruchtwasserinsulinspiegel. Methode: Als Grenzwerte zur Indikation einer Insulintherapie werden für den Nüchternblutzucker ³ 95 ± ³ 105 mg/dl (³ 5,3 ± ³ 5,8 mmol/l), für die postprandiale Glukose ³ 120 ± ³ 130 mg/dl (³ 6,7 ± ³ 7,2 mmol/l) und für die mittlere Blutglukose (MBG) ³ 90 ± ³ 108 mg/dl (³ 5 ± ³ 6 mmol/l) vorgeschlagen, während die prophylaktische Insulintherapie unabhängig von der müt-terlichen Glykämie erfolgt. Der Grenzwert für die Makrosomie ist die 75. Perzentile des fetalen Bauchumfanges und für den Fruchtwasserinsulinspiegel ein Wert von ³ 8 E/ml (³ 48 pmol/ l). Die mütterliche Glykämie hat eine schlechte Korrelation mit dem fetalen Hyperinsulinismus wegen der unterschiedlichen plazentaren Transportfunktion für Glukose und einer unterschiedlichen Sensitivität des fetalen Inselorganes gegenüber Glukosereizen. Ergebnisse: Nach der 31. Woche können hyperinsulinämische Feten postprandiale mütterliche Glukosewerte um durchschnittlich 23 mg/dl (1,3 mmol/l) senken. Es kann dann nicht mehr unterschieden werden, ob eine mütterliche Euglykämie durch eine adäquate Behandlung oder einen exzessiven fetalen Glukosediebstahl bedingt ist. Bei prophylaktischer Insulintherapie werden alle GDM mit normoinsulinämischem Fetus überbe-handelt. Bei der Indikation anhand einer 75. sonographischen Perzentile werden nur makrosome hyperinsulinämische Feten erfasst. 25 % normoinsulinämischer Feten müssen per definitionem die 75. Perzentile überschreiten und werden überbehan-delt. Die Behandlung erfolgt auch zu spät, da eine Makrosomie erst nach dem Hyperinsulinismus auftritt. Bei der Indikation nach dem Fruchtwasserinsulinspiegel findet keine Unter-oder Überbehandlung statt. Die Amniozentese hat keine nennenswerten Komplikationen. Die Akzeptanz beträgt jedoch nur 80 ± 90 %. Das Ausmaû der Unter-oder Überbehandlung wurde anhand von 542 GDM mit bekanntem FWI überprüft. Schlussfolgerung: Geht man davon aus, dass nur GDM mit fetalem Hyperinsulinismus eine Insulintherapie benötigen, führt eine prophylaktische Insulintherapie und die Indikation nach Fruchtwasserinsulinwerten zu keiner Unterbehandlung. Bei der Indikation nach einer MBG von ³ 90 ± ³ 108 mg/dl werden 16 ± 58 % und bei Schätzung der 75. Gewichtsperzentile 44 % unterbehandelt. Bei einer Insulinbehandlung nach Fruchtwasserinsulinwerten findet keine Überbehandlung statt. Bei einer MBG von ³ 90 ± ³ 108 mg/dl werden 75 ± 18 %, bei der 75. Gewichtsperzentile > 25 % und bei prophylaktischer Insulintherapie 1...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.