1998
DOI: 10.1126/science.282.5397.2256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevention of Population Cycles by Parasite Removal

Abstract: dynamics of dissolved nutrient patches. We have yet to identify the frequency of occurrence and magnitude spectra of such patches in specific microbial food webs. They undoubtedly represent interesting ecological niches for bacteria, and they will also contribute much to our understanding of the flow of nutrients and energy in aquatic ecosystems if they prove to be major pathways.References and notes 1. J. C. Goldman, Bull. Mar. Sci. 35, 462 (1984). 2. E. M. Purcell, Am. J. Phys. 45, 3 (1977). 3. G. A. Jackson… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
668
1
5

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 795 publications
(679 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
5
668
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence from different other fields also support this hypothesis (Pulkkinen and Dieter, 2006). Various programs for the management of disease in natural populations also suggest the control of the diseased population through predation (Hudson et al, 1998;Choisy and Rohani, 2006;Greenman and Hoyle, 2010;Hawlena et al, 2010). On the other hand, there are also studies showing an increase in infection in prey populations due to the presence of predators (Holt and Roy, 2007;Bate and Hilker, 2013a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evidence from different other fields also support this hypothesis (Pulkkinen and Dieter, 2006). Various programs for the management of disease in natural populations also suggest the control of the diseased population through predation (Hudson et al, 1998;Choisy and Rohani, 2006;Greenman and Hoyle, 2010;Hawlena et al, 2010). On the other hand, there are also studies showing an increase in infection in prey populations due to the presence of predators (Holt and Roy, 2007;Bate and Hilker, 2013a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Various programs for the management of disease in natural populations suggest the control of infection through predation (Hudson et al, 1998;Choisy and Rohani, 2006;Hawlena et al, 2010;Greenman and Hoyle, 2010). However, several theoretical and empirical evidence shows both increase and decrease of the infection prevalence of the disease due to the predation on infected population (Packer et al, 2003;Holt and Roy, 2007;Cá ceres et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decreases in host fecundity mediated by the parasite are thought to be the main cause of these cycles. Accordingly, the potential effect of hypobiosis, related in the first paper, was not even evoked in the later one (Hudson et al 1998). Our own results confirm that hypobiosis should not have an important impact on the T. tenuis-red grouse interaction as we observed that for a level of aggregation as strong as that of T. tenuis (kZ1, Dobson & Hudson 1992) hypobiosis is expected to have no effect on the host population dynamics, irrespective of the proportion of arrested larvae (s) or the duration of arrestment (1/q).…”
Section: Hypobiosis and The Dynamics Of Natural Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leaving apart the effect of the duration of hypobiosis, only a few specific host-parasite systems have the required properties to test our theoretical predictions of the effect of hypobiosis on the stability of hostparasite interactions. Dobson & Hudson (1992) and Hudson et al (1998) showed that the influence of the nematode parasite T. tenuis was necessary and sufficient to produce the observed cycles in the red grouse populations. Decreases in host fecundity mediated by the parasite are thought to be the main cause of these cycles.…”
Section: Hypobiosis and The Dynamics Of Natural Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the ability to reduce worm burdens experimentally is limited to the time when anthelmintics can be administered and the duration of the effective treatment period. Usually, a single oral dosing or injection is used to deliver the anthelmintic in the wild (Murray et al 1997;Hudson et al 1998;Irvine, 2000;Newey et al 2005;Pedersen and Greives, 2008) and the period of efficacy is generally a maximum of 3-5 weeks. However, slow-release intra-ruminal devices have been developed for livestock which deliver a therapeutic dose over a period of up to 100 days (Cardinal, 1997;Vandamme and Ellis, 2004) reducing both labour and material costs in the control of nematode parasites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%