2019
DOI: 10.3390/su11154145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preventive Archaeology Based on Open Remote Sensing Data and Tools: The Cases of Sant’Arsenio (SA) and Foggia (FG), Italy

Abstract: Sentinel-2 data have been used in various fields of human activity. In cultural heritage, their potential is still to be fully explored. This paper aims to illustrate how remote sensing and open source tools are useful for archaeological investigations. The whole issue revolves around the application of satellite (Sentinel-2) and accessory tools for the identification, knowledge and protection of the cultural heritage of two areas of southern Italy: Sant’Arsenio (SA) and Foggia (FG). Both study cases were sele… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the differences that indicate the presence of possible structures or effects of anthropogenic transformation of landscape were well delineated using the spectral separability (see Figures 5 and 6) applied to the ROIs within the individual bands and the spectral indices. The most performing indices are those involving the Green, Red, and NIR bands, such as (i) crop-band, (ii) soil-band, (iii) RN, (iv) NDVI (Table 2), as expected according to the past investigations [7,8,[11][12][13][14][70][71][72][73][74][75][76]. This is certainly due to the high resolution that the Sentinel-2 satellites have in these bands (10 m).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, the differences that indicate the presence of possible structures or effects of anthropogenic transformation of landscape were well delineated using the spectral separability (see Figures 5 and 6) applied to the ROIs within the individual bands and the spectral indices. The most performing indices are those involving the Green, Red, and NIR bands, such as (i) crop-band, (ii) soil-band, (iii) RN, (iv) NDVI (Table 2), as expected according to the past investigations [7,8,[11][12][13][14][70][71][72][73][74][75][76]. This is certainly due to the high resolution that the Sentinel-2 satellites have in these bands (10 m).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The investigation was performed using multi-temporal (2016-2018) Sentinel-2 multispectral dataset, already used in the field of remote sensing-based archaeology [11,12]. They have been herein analyzed using Time Series Analysis and Spectral Un-mixing tools (available in SNAP: https: //step.esa.int/main/doc/tutorials/snap-tutorials/) to cope with the main challenges to face: (i) the fact that the archaeological features linked to buried remains are generally not permanent but only visible in specific observational conditions, and (ii) the need to identify sub-pixel anomalies linked to features of potential archaeological interest.…”
Section: Sentine-2 Data Processing To Characterize the Spectral Signamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Remote sensing (RS) provides a rapid and low-cost way of exploring, mapping and monitoring archaeological features of interest (AOIs) across the world [29]. Research that involves the identification of AOIs increasingly employs aerial photographs and spy satellite images [30][31][32][33] as well as multispectral and hyperspectral imagery [34][35][36][37][38], SAR data [39][40][41][42], and LiDAR products [43][44][45]. RS has unique advantages for detecting the large archaeological sites such as the Silk Road, Grand Canal, Nasca Lines and Great Wall [4].…”
Section: Archaeological Remote Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several techniques have been used and are well described in the literature: the use of historical maps and aerial photos, associated with GIS (Geographic Information System) to understand landscape changes (urban sprawl, land use, subsidence phenomena, and geomorphological variations etc.) over time, for CH risk assessment or management [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ]; the use of multisensor and multitemporal satellite data such as declassified optical data [ 14 ] and medium-high resolution multispectral data [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ], or SAR (synthetic aperture radar) data [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ], for anthropogenic (land use change, destruction, looting) or natural (floods, subsidence, fires, etc.) risk assessment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%