Preventing Childhood Disorders, Substance Abuse, and Delinquency 1996
DOI: 10.4135/9781483327679.n9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Preventive Interventions for High-Risk Youth: The Adolescent Transitions Program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
73
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall sample included 224 participants (111 boys, 113 girls) aged 10-14 at outset of study. Families were recruited through a number of sources, including newspaper ads, community flyers, school counselors, and other community professionals, with negligible differences found across families related to the source of recruitment (Dishion, Andrews, Kavanagh, & Soberman, 1996). In an initial telephone interview with potential participants, parents were asked to report on 10 areas of early adolescent risk: closeness to parents, academic engagement, emotional adjustment, experience seeking, involvement in prosocial activities, problem behaviors, the child's substance use, peer substance use, family substance use history, and stressful life events (Bry, McKeon, & Pardina, 1982).…”
Section: Methods Sample and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The overall sample included 224 participants (111 boys, 113 girls) aged 10-14 at outset of study. Families were recruited through a number of sources, including newspaper ads, community flyers, school counselors, and other community professionals, with negligible differences found across families related to the source of recruitment (Dishion, Andrews, Kavanagh, & Soberman, 1996). In an initial telephone interview with potential participants, parents were asked to report on 10 areas of early adolescent risk: closeness to parents, academic engagement, emotional adjustment, experience seeking, involvement in prosocial activities, problem behaviors, the child's substance use, peer substance use, family substance use history, and stressful life events (Bry, McKeon, & Pardina, 1982).…”
Section: Methods Sample and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an initial telephone interview with potential participants, parents were asked to report on 10 areas of early adolescent risk: closeness to parents, academic engagement, emotional adjustment, experience seeking, involvement in prosocial activities, problem behaviors, the child's substance use, peer substance use, family substance use history, and stressful life events (Bry, McKeon, & Pardina, 1982). Parents who reported the current presence of at least four risk factors were invited to participate further in the study (for additional information, see Dishion & Andrews, 1995;Dishion et al, 1996).Nearly two-thirds of the current families participated in a brief prevention program targeting early-adolescent substance use, presented in either a family-or teen-group format. Intervention effects were found for child substance use, in addition to parent-child interaction quality, family conflict, and teacher, parent, and child-reported disruptive behavior (see Dishion & Andrews, 1995;Dishion et al, 1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The principal reason is that the child will gravitate toward a deviant peer group by early adolescence (Dishion et al, 1991). The deviant peer group serves as a training ground for antisocial and violent behavior from middle to late adolescence (Dishion, Andrews, Kavanagh, & Soberman, 1996;Dishion, Eddy, Haas, Li, & Spracklen, 1997). Deviant peer groups further increase the risk of substance abuse (Dishion, Capaldi, Spracklen, & Li, 1995), which has been strongly linked to partner violence in adults (Murphy, O'Farrell, Fals-Stewart, & Feehan, 2001).…”
Section: Theoretical Model Of Partner Violence Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, individuals with high-risk profiles-a greater number of risk factors, or risk factors of greater severity-are targeted to receive selective or indicated preventions that provide more intensive and multifaceted services. In some cases, prevention programs will initially implement a universal model and then look to implement an additional selective or indicated model for subgroups of participants who demonstrate greater need~Dishion, Andrews, Kavanagh, & Soberman, 1996!. Currently, family-based prevention models that target selective and indicated populations are far less prevalent than those targeting universal populations~Tolan, 1996!. This may be due in large part to the greater demands of implementing prevention programs for high-risk youth and families.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%