2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-015-1941-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Previous mating experience increases fighting success during male-male contests in the hermit crab Pagurus nigrofascia

Abstract: 13 14Prior social experience often affects subsequent competitive interactions and their outcomes. 15 Although the effects of prior contest experience have been widely examined, effects of mating 16 experience remain less well examined. We examined, in males of the hermit crab Pagurus 17 nigrofascia, whether males successively copulated with more than one female, and whether 18 males with copulation experience differed in their subsequent contest behaviors and probability 19 of winning in male-male contests… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The benefits of experience can even accrue across different contexts. In the hermit crab P. nigrofascia prior experience of copulation increases the chance of success in subsequent agonistic encounters (Yasuda, Matsuo, & Wada, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefits of experience can even accrue across different contexts. In the hermit crab P. nigrofascia prior experience of copulation increases the chance of success in subsequent agonistic encounters (Yasuda, Matsuo, & Wada, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It could be argued that our failure to support Rench's rule in the studied spider crabs is due to the absence of strong agonistic interactions among males when competing for access to receptive females (i.e., a violation of a relevant assumption). Nonetheless, malemale competition is a well-known process in crustaceans, including spider crabs (Diesel, 1991;Sneddon et al, 1997;Yasuda et al, 2015). Furthermore, female preference for larger males have been well demonstrated in this group as well (Corgos et al, 2006;Murai and Blackwell, 2006).…”
Section: Two Different Ontogenetic Phases Inmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Based on game theory and energy cost models (Parker 1974;Maynard Smith 1979;Enquist and Leimar 1987;Riechert 1988), the likelihood of engaging and expending energy in an agonistic interaction will depend on the value of the resource and the probability of success (Riechert 1988;Stuart-Fox 2006). Dominance hierarchies may predict contest outcomes and may be determined by experience (Dugatkin 1997;Hsu and Wolf 1999;Yasuda et al 2014Yasuda et al , 2015; by differences in morphological structures, pheromones, and size (e.g., Rabeni 1985;Pavey and Fielder 1996;Moore and Moore 1999;Kasumovic et al 2010;Hardy and Briffa 2013); and by other conditionCommunicated by T. Breithaupt dependent characteristics due to age or physiological state (see Dugatkin and Reeve 1998). In crustaceans, the maintenance of dominance hierarchies is determined largely by size (Jachowski 1974;Huntingford et al 1995;Sato and Nagayama 2011); individuals rarely engage in costly fights and contests are generally resolved quickly by one individual, usually the smaller retreating (Warner 1977).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%