2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2012.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Price induced irrigation water saving: Unraveling conflicts and synergies between European agricultural and water policies for a Greek Water District

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
26
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies found that water pricing is an effective way to improve water allocation and to encourage water conservation [6][7][8]. However, many other studies found that the price mechanism has failed to generate a force for water conservation [9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies found that water pricing is an effective way to improve water allocation and to encourage water conservation [6][7][8]. However, many other studies found that the price mechanism has failed to generate a force for water conservation [9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This over-simplistic scenario, where no other effects are considered, is the hidden assumption of many studies assessing the expected water savings from irrigation modernization plans (a good example of this can be found in the Spanish Irrigation Plan 6 ). However, farmers are profit maximizing agents that change their choices depending on conditions on revenues and costs, and water demand is derived from this choice (Gómez and Pérez-Blanco, 2012;Kampas et al, 2012;Rivers and Groves, 2013). Since the technical shift means also a change in the incentives in place, farmers will not normally continue taking the same decisions as before.…”
Section: Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given a demand function characterized by productive users' willingness to pay for a marginal unit of water, institutions can adjust charges to determine the amount of extraction and resulting environmental flows at any (site-specific) location and moment in time (permanent and incremental charges). 5 Higher charges strengthen the participation constraint, and contribute to water policy objectives through reduced use or higher cost-recovery -provided revenues are earmarked for water conservation-related policies (Kampas et al 2012;Pérez-Blanco et al 2016). When river basins are closed, charging resource costs to water-users can also result in a more efficient market allocation, penalizing those that are less productive and allowing for the entrance of more productive users (Berrittella et al 2007).…”
Section: Pricing and Chargesmentioning
confidence: 99%