2014
DOI: 10.3982/ecta10662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Price Setting With Menu Cost for Multiproduct Firms

Abstract: We model the decisions of a multiproduct firm that faces a fixed “menu” cost: once it is paid, the firm can adjust the price of all its products. We characterize analytically the steady state firm's decisions in terms of the structural parameters: the variability of the flexible prices, the curvature of the profit function, the size of the menu cost, and the number of products sold. We provide expressions for the steady state frequency of adjustment, the hazard rate of price adjustments, and the size distribut… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second identifying assumption is that restaurants and other FAFH outlets want to maintain relatively stable prices-in other words, they face nonzero menu costs (e.g., Alvarez & Lippi, 2014) or otherwise "sticky" prices, which implies the exclusion restriction, b = 0 23 . This exclusion restriction says shocks to FAFH expenditure are independent of contemporaneous shocks to wholesale prices.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second identifying assumption is that restaurants and other FAFH outlets want to maintain relatively stable prices-in other words, they face nonzero menu costs (e.g., Alvarez & Lippi, 2014) or otherwise "sticky" prices, which implies the exclusion restriction, b = 0 23 . This exclusion restriction says shocks to FAFH expenditure are independent of contemporaneous shocks to wholesale prices.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, considering multi-product firms would allow to weaken the 'selection effect' which is inherent in state-dependent pricing models, and which explains why these models usually deliver much less monetary non-neutrality than their time-dependent counterparts. Alvarez and Lippi (2014) notably show that when the number of different goods priced by each firm tends to infinity, the selection effect vanishes and the amount of monetary non-neutrality generated by state-dependent models is as high as that generated by the popular model of Taylor (1980).…”
Section: Single-good Firmsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…F.1 The Sufficient Statistic in Alvarez et al (2016Alvarez et al ( , 2020 The analytical menu cost model in Alvarez et al (2016aAlvarez et al ( , 2020 is set in continuous time and features no stochastic monetary shocks, random menu costs, Gaussian idiosyncratic productivity shocks, no trend inflation, and firm quadratic objective functions, among other ingredients. This model captures the essence of many pricing models including Taylor (1980), Calvo (1983), Reis ( 2006), Golosov and Lucas (2007), Nakamura and Steinsson (2010), Midrigan ( 2011) and Alvarez and Lippi (2014). 16 In Alvarez et al (2016aAlvarez et al ( , 2020, they summarize monetary non-neutrality M by the following expression when monetary shocks are small:…”
Section: E Robustness To Measurement Errormentioning
confidence: 99%