2002
DOI: 10.3905/jod.2002.319197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pricing Convertible Bonds Subject to Default Risk

Abstract: Downloaded from www.iijournals.com by NEW YORK UNIVERSITY on 08/06/15.It is illegal to make unauthorized copies of this article, forward to an unauthorized user or to post electronically without Publisher permission. s(0) = 30, p = 0.7114, u = 1.2214, d = 0.8187, Conversion ratio = 3, Call price = 105, Risk-free yield = 10%, and Risky yield = 15%.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our model also differs from the model of Hung and Wang [2002] who, among other differences, assume no correlation. We model correlation analogously to the approach of Hull [2003, p. 474].…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Our model also differs from the model of Hung and Wang [2002] who, among other differences, assume no correlation. We model correlation analogously to the approach of Hull [2003, p. 474].…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In McConnell and Schwartz [9], they 978-1-4244-5540-9/10/$26.00 ©2010 IEEE develop a pricing model based on a finite-difference method with the stock price as stochastic variable. Ho and Pfeffer [23] extends the work by introducing stochastic interest rate model, and Hung and Wang [18] proposes a tree-based model that accounts for both stochastic interest rates and default probabilities. Similar credit-risk approaches are followed by Davis [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ammann et al (2003) extend this approach by accounting for call features with various trigger conditions. Also Hung and Wang (2002) propose a tree-based model that accounts for both stochastic interest rates and default probabilities but looses its recombining property. A further tree-based model is presented by Carayannopoulos and Kalimipalli (2003), who use a trinomial tree and incorporates the reduced-form Duffie and Singleton (1999) credit-risk model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%