2009
DOI: 10.1142/s0219024909005154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pricing Double Barrier Parisian Options Using Laplace Transforms

Abstract: In this article, we study a double barrier version of the standard Parisian options. We give closed formulas for the Laplace transforms of their prices with respect to the maturity time. We explain how to invert them numerically and prove a result on the accuracy of the numerical inversion when the function to be recovered is sufficiently smooth. Henceforth, we study the regularity of the Parisian option prices with respect to maturity time and prove that except for particular values of the barriers, the price… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 2 shows the prices of Parisian down-and-in calls, valued using parameters σ = 0.2, r = 0.05, T = 1 year, K = 95, and L = 90, and at different window lengths D and initial stock price S 0 . Table 3 gives a comparison of the CPU times for our algorithm and that using the Laplace inversion technique in [9], computed using the above parameters and S 0 = 90. Due to the increasing number of recursions required, the computation times increase rapidly as the window length decreases.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 2 shows the prices of Parisian down-and-in calls, valued using parameters σ = 0.2, r = 0.05, T = 1 year, K = 95, and L = 90, and at different window lengths D and initial stock price S 0 . Table 3 gives a comparison of the CPU times for our algorithm and that using the Laplace inversion technique in [9], computed using the above parameters and S 0 = 90. Due to the increasing number of recursions required, the computation times increase rapidly as the window length decreases.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Avellandea and Wu [3] used a lattice method. Labart and Lelong [9] used an inversion formula based on the Abate and Whitt [1] method, while Bernard, Courtois, and Quittard-Pinon [4] obtained numerical prices by approximating the Laplace transforms using a linear combination of fractional functions. In this paper, we used a different method to obtain the option price without numerically inverting its Laplace transform.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have established pricing formulae for MinParisianHit and MaxParisianHit options. These fair prices contain single Laplace transforms which need to be inverted numerically using techniques as in Labart and Lelong [17], Abate and Whitt [1] and Bernard et al [4].…”
Section: Option Triggered At Maximum Of Parisian and Hitting Timesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we study excursion and hitting time using a three state semi-Markov model indicating whether the process is in a positive or negative excursion and above or below a fixed barrier. This will allow us to compute the double Laplace transform of these two stopping times, which can be inverted numerically using techniques as in Labart and Lelong [17]. Gauthier [14], [15] studies the first instant when a standard Brownian motion either spends consecutively more than a certain time above a certain level, or reaches another level, i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concluding numerical examples will show the reader how the various Parisian option types behave that can be constructed from the doublesided Parisian knock-in call. The double-sided Parisian option treated by [17] differs from the one treated here as will be pointed out in the next section.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%