1977
DOI: 10.2307/2006423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primal Hybrid Finite Element Methods for 2nd Order Elliptic Equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
162
0
3

Year Published

1992
1992
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
162
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Problem (8) is a particular case of the general hybrid formulation proposed in [4]. Therefore, this result follows, as in [4], from the proof of Theorem 1 in [8].…”
Section: The Hybrid Formulationsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Problem (8) is a particular case of the general hybrid formulation proposed in [4]. Therefore, this result follows, as in [4], from the proof of Theorem 1 in [8].…”
Section: The Hybrid Formulationsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The global action guarantees that the local functions are correctly glued together, see the characterization (2.12) of H 1 0 (Ω) in Raviart and Thomas [13].…”
Section: (W(x) − W(y)) (V(x) − V(y))mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…As far as we know, the use of the space X δ was introduced by Raviart and Thomas [13] and X was considered by Braess, Dahmen and Wieners [2] and by Ben Belgacem [3]. Following their analysis, one sees that H 1 0 (Ω) can be identify as a subspace of X and, also, as a subspace of X δ by means of appropriate linear restrictions:…”
Section: (W(x) − W(y)) (V(x) − V(y))mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let Π h denote the usual Raviart-Thomas projection, which has the following properties [1,3,22,23,27] (…”
Section: Error Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%