Abstract:Incidence of canaliculitis was 1.4%. Most common isolate was streptococcus species. Snip-punctoplasty and curettage is a safe and efficacious modality of treatment of canaliculitis. Post-operative epiphora occurred in 8.7% patients.
“…In our study, the gender distribution was equal (50 %), comparable to Kim et al (50 %) [2] and Kaliki et al (46 %) [4]. Other studies postulated a female predominance due to mascara use and hormonally related issues [1,4,10].…”
Section: Lacrimal Outflow Obstruction 2 B 2 Esupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Lee et al performed 1-snip punctoplasties and canalicular curettage with a success rate of 83.3 % [6]. Kim et al described a 22 % persistence of symptoms [2] and Pavilack et al a 45 and 55 % persistence and recurrence rate [7]. Canaliculotomies have been described as efficient and safe with resolution rates as high as 80-100 % [1,8,13].…”
Section: Lacrimal Outflow Obstruction 2 B 2 Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, curettage can potentially damage the canalicular lining and end up in a scarred lacrimal duct system. Lee et al found strictures after curettage and Kim et al outline epiphora symptoms in 8.7 % after snip punctoplasty and curettage [2,6].…”
Section: Lacrimal Outflow Obstruction 2 B 2 Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite well-described and typical clinical findings, canaliculitis is a rare disease and often misdiagnosed [1]. Kim et al found a 1.4 % incidence of canaliculitis and stated that 2-4 % of patients with lacrimal diseases account for this issue [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Canaliculotomy and snip punctoplasty with thorough curettage are preferred surgical procedures [6], but the concern of lacrimal pump dysfunction and canalicular scarring with postsurgical epiphora remains [7]. Studies have shown that snip punctoplasties [2] and canaliculotomies [8] are safe and effective with no major risk of postsurgical epiphora. To the best of our knowledge, no clinical follow-up reports on the actual healing of canaliculotomies are published in the literature.…”
“…In our study, the gender distribution was equal (50 %), comparable to Kim et al (50 %) [2] and Kaliki et al (46 %) [4]. Other studies postulated a female predominance due to mascara use and hormonally related issues [1,4,10].…”
Section: Lacrimal Outflow Obstruction 2 B 2 Esupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Lee et al performed 1-snip punctoplasties and canalicular curettage with a success rate of 83.3 % [6]. Kim et al described a 22 % persistence of symptoms [2] and Pavilack et al a 45 and 55 % persistence and recurrence rate [7]. Canaliculotomies have been described as efficient and safe with resolution rates as high as 80-100 % [1,8,13].…”
Section: Lacrimal Outflow Obstruction 2 B 2 Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, curettage can potentially damage the canalicular lining and end up in a scarred lacrimal duct system. Lee et al found strictures after curettage and Kim et al outline epiphora symptoms in 8.7 % after snip punctoplasty and curettage [2,6].…”
Section: Lacrimal Outflow Obstruction 2 B 2 Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite well-described and typical clinical findings, canaliculitis is a rare disease and often misdiagnosed [1]. Kim et al found a 1.4 % incidence of canaliculitis and stated that 2-4 % of patients with lacrimal diseases account for this issue [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Canaliculotomy and snip punctoplasty with thorough curettage are preferred surgical procedures [6], but the concern of lacrimal pump dysfunction and canalicular scarring with postsurgical epiphora remains [7]. Studies have shown that snip punctoplasties [2] and canaliculotomies [8] are safe and effective with no major risk of postsurgical epiphora. To the best of our knowledge, no clinical follow-up reports on the actual healing of canaliculotomies are published in the literature.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.