Conference on Advanced Technology for Future Space Systems 1979
DOI: 10.2514/6.1979-881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary electric propulsion for future space missions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A discharge could not be maintained for JD > 12.8 A. When magnet rings numbers 3, 4, and 5 were isolated, no significant change in production cost or discharge voltage occurred. There were also no discharge instabilities.…”
Section: Discharge Chamber Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A discharge could not be maintained for JD > 12.8 A. When magnet rings numbers 3, 4, and 5 were isolated, no significant change in production cost or discharge voltage occurred. There were also no discharge instabilities.…”
Section: Discharge Chamber Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As indicated in table VII, most of the discharge current for the high field strength configuration number 5 was collected at ring number 2. This may have contributed to the poor performance and instability of the d~s1gn by loss of energetic electrons directly to the anode without ionizing neutral propellant, and by reducing the effective anode area.…”
Section: Discharge Chamber Performancementioning
confidence: 99%