1984
DOI: 10.1016/0047-2670(84)80038-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary photochemical and photophysical processes in 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,2-dihydroquinolines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculated value of the parameter 2k 3 /ε λ is 3-4 orders of magnitude lower than the corresponding values for hydrocarbon solutions [5,10,18]. The rate constant k 1 probably characterizes the exit of the radicals from the micellar core, where they are generated, into the Stern layer and the aqueous phase, where they recombine with the rate constant k 3 .…”
Section: Dhq Photolysis In the Micellar Solutions Of The Cationic Surmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The calculated value of the parameter 2k 3 /ε λ is 3-4 orders of magnitude lower than the corresponding values for hydrocarbon solutions [5,10,18]. The rate constant k 1 probably characterizes the exit of the radicals from the micellar core, where they are generated, into the Stern layer and the aqueous phase, where they recombine with the rate constant k 3 .…”
Section: Dhq Photolysis In the Micellar Solutions Of The Cationic Surmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…(2) and (3), A λ is the total absorbance registered at the wavelength λ, is the initial absorbance of the intermediate species i at the registration wavelength (the set of values at different wavelengths is the absorption spectrum of the species i), k i is the decay rate constant for the species i, l is the optical path length, and ε λ is the molar absorption coefficient of the species at the registration wavelength. In this study, ε λ in the CTAB micellar solutions was not determined, and the values of 2k 3 /ε λ were compared with the corresponding parameters obtained for hydrocarbon solutions [5,18] assuming that ε λ does not change significantly in micellar solutions. In flash photolysis experiments, bimolecular rate constants are determined with a factor of 1/ε λ ; that is, the calculated parameter is 2k 3 /ε λ .…”
Section: Dhq Photolysis In the Micellar Solutions Of The Cationic Surmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the drastic decrease in the fluorescence lifetime in MeOH should increase the overall rate constant of nonradiative transitions (k NR ) in this solvent. We did not measure the ratio of the quantum yields of internal conversion and intersystem crossing in this work, but it was shown in [5] that internal conversion is the main channel of nonradiative energy deactivation (ϕ ISC < 0.02 in toluene). Therefore, we may assume that the variations in the rate constant of nonradiative transitions are determined mainly by changes in the rate constant of internal conversion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In aprotic solvents and alcohols with C > 1, the homolytic cleavage of the N-H bond to give corresponding aminyl radicals was observed in the case of sec -DHQ [4]. The quantum yields of the homolytic photodissociation of the N-H bond in aprotic solvents upon excitation of the long-wavelength absorption band are low, and the fluorescence quantum yields are high [5,6]. This is accounted for by the fact that the reaction occurs from the first excited singlet rather than triplet state, and this process, as was shown earlier [5,7,8], has low efficiency.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Polycyclic aromatic compounds, well-known as “polyarenes”, always remain as frontier candidates for photophysical studies since the introduction of photophysical measurements to the scientific community. These molecules generally possess strong absorption in the near-UV and visible range and are highly emissive in most cases. ,, Thus, most of these molecules are cited as a classic reference for the explanation of basic photophysical aspects . Notably, the rigid molecular structure of these molecules does not corroborate the excited state decay through nonradiative pathways.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%