1964
DOI: 10.2307/1937106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary Production and the Disappearance of Dead Vegetation on an Old Field in Southeastern Michigan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
135
0
5

Year Published

1976
1976
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 278 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
11
135
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in disappearance rates of litter from the undisturbed site, Agua Leche, the moderately grazed and burned site, Loma Alta and the heavily grazed and burned site, Loma Baja, were estimated with a litterbag experiment (Wiegert and Evans, 1964). The results of this experiment provided extra information on decomposition.…”
Section: Litter Disappearancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in disappearance rates of litter from the undisturbed site, Agua Leche, the moderately grazed and burned site, Loma Alta and the heavily grazed and burned site, Loma Baja, were estimated with a litterbag experiment (Wiegert and Evans, 1964). The results of this experiment provided extra information on decomposition.…”
Section: Litter Disappearancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…the change are similar to those reported in other studies (Bocock, 1964;Bocock and Gilbert, 1957;Falconer, Wright and Beall, 1933;Olson, 1963;Shanks and Olson, 1961;Wiegert and Evans, 1964).…”
Section: Mass and Energy Considerationssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This accumu lation of mass, thus energy, on the forest floor has never been reported to have any detrimental effect on the total productivity of the deciduous forest system. The rate of litter decay in old fields and forests has been extensively discussed (Bocock, 1964;Bocock and Gilbert, 1957;Falconer, Wright and Beall, 1933;Olson, 1963, Shanks andOlson, 1961;Wiegert and Evans, 1964).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feeding range was determined by observing the area of significant grazing pressure. The dry weight of primary production within it was determined according to the methods described by Weigert & Evans (1964), and converted to the calorific equivalent by multiplying the ash-free dry weight by 4.5. The digestibility coefficient of the diet has been assumed to average 50% on the basis of determinations by Drożdż et al (1971) of the degree of assimilation achieved by water voles fed on grass and other plant material.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%