2001
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.021560298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary reactions of sensory rhodopsins

Abstract: The first steps in the photocycles of the archaeal photoreceptor proteins sensory rhodopsin (SR) I and II from Halobacterium salinarum and SRII from Natronobacterium pharaonis have been studied by ultrafast pump͞probe spectroscopy and steady-state fluorescence spectroscopy. The data for both species of the bluelight receptor SRII suggests that their primary reactions are nearly analogous with a fast decay of the excited electronic state in 300 -400 fs and a transition between two red-shifted product states in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
54
1
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
12
54
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been also proposed that the first step in OCP photoactivation involves a rotation of the β-ionone ring about the C6-C7 single bond in the CTD (9). However, our observations do not support significant rotational motions in both β-ionone rings nor a photoisomerization event as observed for retinal in rhodopsins (33). Instead, the difference electron densities suggest a small displacement of the carotenoid mostly in the plane of the polyene chain (Fig.…”
contrasting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been also proposed that the first step in OCP photoactivation involves a rotation of the β-ionone ring about the C6-C7 single bond in the CTD (9). However, our observations do not support significant rotational motions in both β-ionone rings nor a photoisomerization event as observed for retinal in rhodopsins (33). Instead, the difference electron densities suggest a small displacement of the carotenoid mostly in the plane of the polyene chain (Fig.…”
contrasting
confidence: 55%
“…We propose that the initial photochemical event in OCP originates in the essential conjugated carbonyl group of the β1 ring, where a lightinduced shift in keto-enol equilibrium weakens the interactions between the chromophore and protein moiety. Similar to other photoreceptors (33,38), subsequent protein structural changes in OCP are driven by thermal relaxation of the strained chromophore in a confined protein cavity. However, a key difference is that the strain energy is preloaded in a distorted ketocarotenoid in the OCP O structure, whereas the initial conformational strain arises from photoisomerization in phytochromes and rhodopsins (33,38).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high similarity to the primary dynamics observed in BR and in NpSRII, [18] especially the high resemblance of the time constants (see Table 1), is taken as evidence that the driving forces of the primary events, for example, the electrostatics in www.chemphyschem.org the binding pocket, the hydrogen-bonding network, and also the steric properties, are most likely close to the conditions found in BR. The primary reaction dynamics can therefore be interpreted within the framework of the models developed for this protein.…”
Section: Ultrafast Excited-state Deactivationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…[15][16][17] 0.1 0.5 3-5 -infinite NpSRII [18] 0.1 0.4 5 -infinite Figure 5. DAS of the global fit analysis of the Vis pump-Vis probe dataset using five decay time constants.…”
Section: Ultrafast Reaction Dynamics Determined By Visible Pump-probementioning
confidence: 98%
“…An example are the transducers mediating the phototactic response. Natronomonas has a single blue-light photoreceptor (sensory rhodopsin II; SRII, NP4834A) that is photochemically very similar to the blue-light photoreceptor SRII from Halobacterium but rather different from the orange/UV light photoreceptor SRI (Lutz et al 2001). Although the transducers HtrII from these two archaea form a complex with their respective blue-light photoreceptors SRII (thus mediating the same photophobic response) and genes for receptor and transducer are cotranscribed (Seidel et al 1995;Zhang et al 1996), their domain architecture differs.…”
Section: Motility and Signal Transductionmentioning
confidence: 99%