2000
DOI: 10.1039/a9rp90025j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary School Teachers’ Views on Fundamental Chemical Concepts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…About 20 % of teachers also think that the air from outside forms liquid drops. Previous studies have reported that some teachers hold inadequate conceptions, which are not scientifically accepted (Burgoon et al 2010;Papageorgiou and Sakka 2000;Smith and Neale 1991). Furthermore, many of these conceptions are similar to those held by students (Mant and Summers 1995;Papageorgiou et al 2010;Quílez-Pardo and Solaz-Portole´s 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…About 20 % of teachers also think that the air from outside forms liquid drops. Previous studies have reported that some teachers hold inadequate conceptions, which are not scientifically accepted (Burgoon et al 2010;Papageorgiou and Sakka 2000;Smith and Neale 1991). Furthermore, many of these conceptions are similar to those held by students (Mant and Summers 1995;Papageorgiou et al 2010;Quílez-Pardo and Solaz-Portole´s 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This is why some teachers are confused about this topic. In this case, textbooks may promote misconceptions both in students and teachers (Papageorgiou & Sakka, 2000). In terms of teaching on the topic of seasons, science teachers have to discuss the effect of monsoon on the seasons in Thailand in order to help students understand the seasons in the Thai context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, very little is known about students' ability to use and apply these classification schemes. Students' alternative conceptions about different types of substances (del Pozo, 2001;Nakhleh & Samarapungavan, 1999;Papageorgiou & Sakka, 2000;Sanger, 2000), types of processes (Abraham, Williamson, & Westbrook, 1994), or types of bonding (Barker & Millar, 2000;Birk & Kurtz, 1999;Coll & Treagust, 2001) have been thoroughly investigated. However, very little attention has been given to exploring the strategies used by chemistry learners with different levels of expertise when classifying substances, processes, or interactions into different groups.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%