2016
DOI: 10.1002/ejp.859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary sensory and motor cortex function in response to acute muscle pain: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract: Acute muscle pain has both motor and sensory consequences, yet the effect of muscle pain on the primary sensory (S1) and motor (M1) cortices has yet to be systematically evaluated. Here we aimed to determine the strength of the evidence for (1) altered activation of S1/ M1 during and after pain, (2) the temporal profile of any change in activation and (3) the relationship between S1/M1 activity and the symptoms of pain. In September 2015, five electronic databases were systematically searched for neuroimaging … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
86
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
7
86
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In light of that theory, our results would be interpreted as indicating that acute pain alters body image (perceptual judgment), but without impacting on body schema. This suggests that some sensorimotor integration processes remain intact in the presence of pain which allows us to maintain adaptive motor behavior, a view supported by two recent studies showing that acute pain does not interfere with sensorimotor integration as measured by short afferent inhibition paradigm (Burns et al, 2016; Mercier et al, 2016). However, it is possible that pain of a longer duration is needed to impact on body schema, given that movement disorders become more prevalent in complex regional pain syndrome as the disease progresses (Van Hilten, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In light of that theory, our results would be interpreted as indicating that acute pain alters body image (perceptual judgment), but without impacting on body schema. This suggests that some sensorimotor integration processes remain intact in the presence of pain which allows us to maintain adaptive motor behavior, a view supported by two recent studies showing that acute pain does not interfere with sensorimotor integration as measured by short afferent inhibition paradigm (Burns et al, 2016; Mercier et al, 2016). However, it is possible that pain of a longer duration is needed to impact on body schema, given that movement disorders become more prevalent in complex regional pain syndrome as the disease progresses (Van Hilten, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Several neuroimaging studies have shown that experimental pain can affect the activity of the motor cortex (Apkarian et al 2000; Tracey et al 2000; Burns et al 2016). For the most part, these studies were done using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few neuroimagery studies have also reported an increase in the activity of the primary motor cortex (M1) in the presence of experimental pain (Apkarian et al 2000; Tracey et al 2000; Burns et al 2016). Stancák et al demonstrated, using electroencephalography (EEG), that the application of a short-lasting painful heat stimuli on the hand decreased the β activity of the sensorimotor cortex (Stancák et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would be of interest in further studies to assess both pain-induced modulation in S1 excitability and SAI given the results of recent studies showing that a decrease in S1 excitability induced by non-invasive stimulation results in a reduction of the amount of SAI. At this stage, the impact of nociceptive stimuli on S1 excitability (as measured by the short latency components of somatosensory evoked potentials) remains unclear, especially for cutaneous nociceptive modalities [30,31,40,41,42,43,44,45]. One also needs to consider that the nociceptive modality and the location of the nociceptive stimuli with respect to the tested muscle might influence the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%