2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary Stability of Osteochondral Grafts Used in Mosaicplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Duchow et al (2000) performed some tests on the use of different plug lengths and diameters and found significant differences, but they only tested the pull-out strength of the plugs, which-clinically-seems to us to be of less importance than the push-through force. More recently, Kordas et al (2005) reported that bottomed plugs were more stable than unbottomed ones, but only a few groups were compared. They also suggested that if plugs were bottomed, a recipient site would result in higher impaction forces to get the (relatively longer) plug at flush level.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Duchow et al (2000) performed some tests on the use of different plug lengths and diameters and found significant differences, but they only tested the pull-out strength of the plugs, which-clinically-seems to us to be of less importance than the push-through force. More recently, Kordas et al (2005) reported that bottomed plugs were more stable than unbottomed ones, but only a few groups were compared. They also suggested that if plugs were bottomed, a recipient site would result in higher impaction forces to get the (relatively longer) plug at flush level.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smaller-sized plugs may be able to fill irregular defects with possibly less donor site morbidity [17]. Nevertheless, smaller grafts are more fragile; have lower pullout strength; and technically, they are more labor-demanding and difficult to harvest and implant [19]. These facts should be considered for subsequent refinement of the technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown that larger grafts are more stable in absolute values, and multiple grafts may not be as stable as single grafts in the initial period following transplantation. [21] Therefore, restriction of weight-bearing is recommended for a certain period of time following mosaicplasty to avoid graft subsidence, until bony integration occurs.…”
Section: Mosaicplastymentioning
confidence: 99%