No abstract

Osteochondral grafts were transplanted from the trochlea of porcine femurs into drill holes that were 20, 15, and 12 mm in length on the lateral femoral condyle. Grafts initially were pushed in flush with the surrounding cartilage, and then a testing machine pushed the grafts 3 mm deeper. For the 20-, 15-, and 12-mm drill holes, mean forces for pushing the graft flush were 36.58, 43.33, and 118.13 N, respectively, while mean forces for pushing the graft 3 mm deeper were 122.50, 249.33, and 377.25 N, respectively. These results suggest primary stability is better when grafts and drill holes are the same length, but if the recipient hole is shorter, excessive force must be exerted on the cartilage cup during insertion.

The current generation of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing designs has largely been characterized by cemented femoral fixation using a cementless cup. We present the clinical results of 135 entirely uncemented metal-on-metal hip resurfacing procedures. The primary outcome measures were revision for any cause and the Oxford hip score at the latest follow up. The average length of followup was 2.9 years. The mean Oxford hip score was 18.4 and no patient required revision of either component during the study period. Uncemented femoral fixation may be comparable to fixation with cement in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

The performance of the Cormet hip resurfacing device was evaluated after a minimum of 5 years in 234 hips. The mean age of the patients was 54 years; there were 135 men and 80 women. The primary diagnosis was osteoarthritis in 78% of the patients. Outcome measures were the Harris Hip Score and implant survival. The overall survival rate was 94% with 12 revisions in women and 3 in men. There were 7 femoral and 5 acetabular failures and two revisions for groin pain. Cumulative survival rate in men and women was 98% and 89%, in patients with a femoral component larger than 44 mm and smaller than 44 mm 97% and 89% respectively. Patients with primary osteoarthritis had a 95% cumulative survival rate at 5 years. The risk of failure was 6.4 times higher in women than in men. Our results suggest that hip resurfacing with the Cormet device is an acceptable alternative for active patients with hip arthritis, but patient selection is crucial for good long-term results.

There is controversy regarding the effect of different approaches on recovery after THR. Collecting detailed relevant data with satisfactory compliance is difficult.Our retrospective observational multi-center study aimed to find out if the data collected via a remote coaching app can be used to monitor the speed of recovery after THR using the anterolateral (ALA), posterior (PA) and the direct anterior approach (DAA).771 patients undergoing THR from 13 centers using the moveUP platform were identified. 239 had ALA, 345 DAA and 42 PA. There was no significant difference between the groups in the sex of patients or in preoperative HOOS Scores. There was however a significantly lower age in the DAA (64,1y) compared to ALA (66,9y), and a significantly lower Oxford Hip Score in the DAA (23,9) compared to PA (27,7). Step count measured by an activity tracker, pain killer and NSAID use was monitored via the app. We recorded when patients started driving following surgery, stopped using crutches, and their HOOS and Oxford hip scores at 6 weeks.Overall compliance with data request was 80%. Patients achieved their preoperative activity level after 25.8, 17,7 and 23.3 days, started driving a car after 33.6, 30.3 and 31.7 days, stopped painkillers after 27.5, 20.2 and 22.5 days, NSAID after 30.3, 25.7, and 24.7 days for ALA, DAA and PA respectively. Painkillers were stopped and preoperative activity levels were achieved significantly earlier favoring DAA over ALA. Similarly, crutches were abandoned significantly earlier (39.9, 29.7 and 24.4 days for ALA, DAA and PA respectively) favoring DAA and PA over ALA. HOOS scores and Oxford Hip scores improved significantly in all 3 groups at 6 weeks, without any statistically significant difference between groups in either Oxford Hip or HOOS subscores.No final conclusion can be drawn as to the superiority of either approach in this study but the remote coaching platform allowed the collection of detailed data which can be used to advise patients individually, manage expectations, improve outcomes and identify areas for further research.