2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10967-013-2575-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primary studies on particle recovery of swipe samples for nuclear safeguards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In laboratory analysis, aerosol cakes can be collected on filter paper and then disaggregated using ultrasonic vibration (Wang et al 2013). Identification of uraniumbearing particles from background is efficiently carried out using neutron-induced fission-track analysis.…”
Section: Conversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In laboratory analysis, aerosol cakes can be collected on filter paper and then disaggregated using ultrasonic vibration (Wang et al 2013). Identification of uraniumbearing particles from background is efficiently carried out using neutron-induced fission-track analysis.…”
Section: Conversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the available techniques, vacuum impactors and vacuum filtration are the most commonly used. [36][37] In the vacuum impaction method, the collection of particles can be performed on a graphite planchet for subsequent SIMS analysis, while the vacuum filtration system is equipped with a membrane filter for use in fission track thermal ionization mass spectrometry (FT-TIMS). In particle analysis, the pre-screening process is required to pinpoint the existence and location of target nuclear materials.…”
Section: Particle Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Established technologies for U detection have limitations that hinder wide area in situ monitoring. Typically, environmental U detection involves in-field sample collection (e.g., from a pumped or bailed water sample)), followed by sample preparation and analytical quantification in the laboratory using mass spectrometry (e.g., ICP-MS, SIMS, FT-TIMs) . While sensitive and selective, these technologies are equipment-intensive, costly, require skillful operation, and cannot be easily applied for in situ sampling, greatly limiting sampling throughput.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%