Primate Anatomy 2007
DOI: 10.1016/b978-012372576-9/50016-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primate Genomics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
81
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
81
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences in canopy use and the accompanying locomotive behavior support our hypothesis relating these behaviors to the morphological differences between the species (Ankel-Simons 2000). Whereas the relatively slender body of Presbytis potenziani with longer hind limbs supports long-distance leaping and traveling in the upper canopy to explore widely scattered and patchy food resources, i.e., fruiting trees, the stockier (macaque-like) body of Simias concolor, in which hind and forelimbs are similar in length, is better suited to a more intensive use of the lower canopy, including the ground level.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The differences in canopy use and the accompanying locomotive behavior support our hypothesis relating these behaviors to the morphological differences between the species (Ankel-Simons 2000). Whereas the relatively slender body of Presbytis potenziani with longer hind limbs supports long-distance leaping and traveling in the upper canopy to explore widely scattered and patchy food resources, i.e., fruiting trees, the stockier (macaque-like) body of Simias concolor, in which hind and forelimbs are similar in length, is better suited to a more intensive use of the lower canopy, including the ground level.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…We used limb proportion estimates calculated from this data set and other published sources (14,16,19,(51)(52)(53) (Tables S11 and S12). Data from Schultz (19) are calculated as the maximum length of the limb from shoulder/hip to finger tip or the sole of the foot divided by trunk length, which differs from the more commonly used intermembral index (IMI) [i.e., (humerus length + radius length)/(femur length + tibia length) × 100] (14, 16).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Humans are a challenge to this model because the relative proportions of our limbs, which are thought to reflect independent adaptations for bipedalism (14)(15)(16), endurance, running (17), manual dexterity, and tool use (15,18), distinguish us from all other primates (14)(15)(16)19) (Fig. 1C).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One hundred fifty-six lumbar vertebrae belonging to 11 species in six genera of subfossil lemurs (Pachylemur, Archaeolemur, Megaladapis, Mesopropithecus, Babakotia, and Palaeopropithecus; Table 1) were compared to those of a phylogenetically diverse sample of extant strepsirrhines (20 species in 17 genera) and haplorhines (six species in six genera; Table 2). Sampled extant species exhibit a wide range of positional behaviors, and their lumbar vertebrae have been shown to vary in accordance with those behaviors (Schultz, 1961;Erikson, 1963;Ankel, 1967Ankel, , 1972Benton, 1967Benton, , 1974Rose, 1975;Shapiro, 1991Shapiro, , 1993aShapiro, ,b, 1995Ward, 1993;Sanders and Bodenbender, 1994;Johnson and Shapiro, 1998;Ankel-Simons, 2000;Shapiro and Simons, 2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%