Prime Suspect: Mechanisms of Labor Control at Amazon's Warehouses

Abstract

What mechanisms has Amazon deployed in its effort to control the labor of its warehouse employees? This question holds both practical and theoretical interest, given Amazon's prominent position in the economy and the wider importance of the logistics sector for consumer capitalism. This paper, part of a broader mixed-methods study of Amazon's workplace regime, uses a small national sample of interviews with Amazon warehouse workers (N = 46) to identify the mechanisms of labor control the company invokes. In keeping with accounts propounded by activists and journalists, we find evidence of highly coercive labor controls, chiefly in the form of what we call techno-economic despotism (which applies algorithmic technology to a precariously employed workforce). Yet many workers also experience forms of labor control that rely not on coercion but on the generation of consent. We identify three such mechanisms of hegemonic labor control - normative, relational, and governmental – that Amazon uses to foster workers’ consent. The efficacy of Amazon's workplace regime stems largely from its ability to deploy a multiplicity of labor controls that resonate with different groups holding distinct positions in the labor process. Given shifts in the social and economic conditions that bear on the company's regime, cracks have begun to appear in Amazon's armor, potentially reducing the traction its labor control mechanisms have gained with segments of its employees.

Algorithmic Management: Its Implications for Information Systems Research

“…Viewing algorithmic technologies as more "encompassing, instantaneous, interactive, and opaque" than previous forms of control (Kellog et. al, 2020, p. 1), research has explored how organizations can use algorithmic management to extend their control over workers to create an "invisible cage" (Rahman, 2021) by taking advantage of information asymmetries, fine-grained measurements, and extensive surveillance (Allen & Choudhury, 2022;Curchod et al, 2019;Vallas et al, 2022). Moreover, Raisch and Krakowski (2020) engage with the divergence between AI automation and augmentation, showing how the two are not mutually exclusive but intricately interwoven in organizational settings.…”

Labor Unbound? Assessing the Current Surge in Labor Activism

“…These data are collated algorithmically, ranking workers against one another and against the production quotas management demands of them. Workers whose rankings lag face discipline or termination, yielding a form of labor control that is especially effective among workers who are weakly positioned in the labor market (Vallas et al, 2022). These systems inevitably generate resistance, prompting Amazon not only to invest in anti-labor consulting firms but also to introduce technologies that can produce “heat maps,” identifying sites where unionization is likely to occur.…”

Professor-in-Training: Status Control of the Teaching Assistant

“…Scholars have shown how workplaces leverage cultivated or pre-established worker statuses to control work that is autonomous or not easily surveilled. Labor processes may be structured around rewarding such ethics as the high achieving (Sharone, 2004), diligent (Vallas et al, 2022), entrepreneurial (Purcell & Brook, 2022), or flexible worker (Boltanski & Chiapello, 2005) in order to align worker interests with those of the company. In Sharone's (2004) study of engineers at a tech firm, status rewards and punishments were key to self-management.…”