2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-19812-0_28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primitive-Based Shape Abstraction via Nonparametric Bayesian Inference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, Liu et al [24] formulate the problem in a probabilistic fashion and propose a geometric strategy to avoid local optimum, bringing a significant improvement in robustness to outlier and fitting accuracy. Wu et al [47] extend and recast the work as a nonparametric Bayesian inference problem so as to improve the applicability on complex shapes. To the best of the authors' knowledge, the existing computational methods are all based on range images or point clouds, which suffer from geometric ambiguities [48].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…More recently, Liu et al [24] formulate the problem in a probabilistic fashion and propose a geometric strategy to avoid local optimum, bringing a significant improvement in robustness to outlier and fitting accuracy. Wu et al [47] extend and recast the work as a nonparametric Bayesian inference problem so as to improve the applicability on complex shapes. To the best of the authors' knowledge, the existing computational methods are all based on range images or point clouds, which suffer from geometric ambiguities [48].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baselines: We compare our method with both the stateof-the-art learning-based method [31] and the computational method [47], which infer superquadric abstractions of the input objects. For convenience, we refer to [31] as SQs, and [47] as NB. We use the official codes and follow the implementation details as stated in these papers, respectively.…”
Section: Evaluation On Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations