1994
DOI: 10.1017/s0960129500000499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Primitive recursion, equality, and a universal set

Abstract: Within a categorical framework for primitive recursion, equality between p.r. maps is shown to be definable by suitable p.r. equality predicates. Equivalence is shown between a direct categorical formalization of classical p.r. functions and p.r. maps in the sense of Lawvere and Freyd. An extension of the theory is shown to admit a 'universal set' containing all objects of the extended theory of subobjects.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each primitive recursive map can be generated from the basic maps 0, s, id, !, ∆, Θ, and ℓ by composition, cylindrification and iteration: substitution is realized via composition with the induced (f, g) = (f, g)(c) = (f (c), g(c)) which in turn is obtained via diagonal, cylindrification, transposition, and composition. Since iteration g § then gives the ("full") schema of primitive recursion (see Freyd 1972, Pfender et al 1994, ev in fact evaluates all Gödel numbers of (internal) p. r. map terms, recursively given in the above way.…”
Section: Appendix: Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each primitive recursive map can be generated from the basic maps 0, s, id, !, ∆, Θ, and ℓ by composition, cylindrification and iteration: substitution is realized via composition with the induced (f, g) = (f, g)(c) = (f (c), g(c)) which in turn is obtained via diagonal, cylindrification, transposition, and composition. Since iteration g § then gives the ("full") schema of primitive recursion (see Freyd 1972, Pfender et al 1994, ev in fact evaluates all Gödel numbers of (internal) p. r. map terms, recursively given in the above way.…”
Section: Appendix: Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%