2014
DOI: 10.1021/es4047507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Principles of Sound Ecotoxicology

Abstract: The NERC and CEH trademarks and logos ('the Trademarks') are registered trademarks of NERC in the UK and other countries, and may not be used without the prior written consent of the Trademark owner. 1 Principles of Sound Ecotoxicology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
107
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
3
107
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Reporting In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines (Kilkenny et al 2010) and ecotoxicological principles proposed by Harris et al (2014).…”
Section: Responsible Editor: Thomas Hutchinsonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reporting In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines (Kilkenny et al 2010) and ecotoxicological principles proposed by Harris et al (2014).…”
Section: Responsible Editor: Thomas Hutchinsonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any component-based study that explores whether CA and/or IA apply for a given mixture inherently assumes that the concentration-response curves of all individual substances are reproducible per se, which also has been discussed as a hallmark for 'sound ecotoxicology' [71]. Unfortunately, almost none of the studies analysed for this review provides information on the reproducibility of the experimental study results.…”
Section: Knowledge Gaps and The Next Stepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Harris et al [10] noted both that the "cost of confirming or refuting the results of a poorly designed study can be extremely high" and that "inaccurate data may mean attention is not focused on the chemicals that are really of environmental concern." They recommend, as do we, both considering the concentrationresponse (or dose-response) and repeating key studies "to verify their conclusions."…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%