2021
DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2021.3059308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Printed Multi-EMG Electrodes on the 3D Surface of an Orthosis for Rehabilitation: A Feasibility Study

Abstract: We cannot accept new source files as corrections for your article. If possible, please annotate the PDF proof we have sent you with your corrections and upload it via the Author Gateway. Alternatively, you may send us your corrections in list format. You may also upload revised graphics via the Author Gateway.Carefully check the page proofs (and coordinate with all authors); additional changes or updates WILL NOT be accepted after the article is published online/print in its final form. Please check author nam… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Printing sensors directly on temperature-sensitive materials for some applications, including SHM (e.g., poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) conduit [84] ) or wearable HPMs (e.g., poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), [85] polyurethane (PU), [85] and cellulose-based materials [86] ) therefore requires alternative strategies to conventional thermal curing methods, as discussed in further detail in the following section. [87] Although rigid glass [88][89][90] and silicon [40,47,74] substrates are classically employed for a wide range of AJP sensor modalities, flexible substrates including polymers (e.g., polyimide, [65,91,92] PET, [93][94][95] elastomers [96][97][98] ), cellulose-based materials [99][100][101] and even storebought bandages [102] are being progressively employed (see Figure 3a). For some flexible substrates (e.g., PET), the conformable morphology of these substrates coupled with the ancillary effect of transparency expands applications to future-forward ideas such as electronic skin and smart contact lenses.…”
Section: Substratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Printing sensors directly on temperature-sensitive materials for some applications, including SHM (e.g., poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) conduit [84] ) or wearable HPMs (e.g., poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), [85] polyurethane (PU), [85] and cellulose-based materials [86] ) therefore requires alternative strategies to conventional thermal curing methods, as discussed in further detail in the following section. [87] Although rigid glass [88][89][90] and silicon [40,47,74] substrates are classically employed for a wide range of AJP sensor modalities, flexible substrates including polymers (e.g., polyimide, [65,91,92] PET, [93][94][95] elastomers [96][97][98] ), cellulose-based materials [99][100][101] and even storebought bandages [102] are being progressively employed (see Figure 3a). For some flexible substrates (e.g., PET), the conformable morphology of these substrates coupled with the ancillary effect of transparency expands applications to future-forward ideas such as electronic skin and smart contact lenses.…”
Section: Substratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another recent study, a multi‐EMG electrode matrix was developed onto the 3D surface of a rehabilitation leg orthosis. [ 98 ] Composed of AJP‐deposited silver‐based electrodes and conductive traces, muscular activity was evaluated, with results demonstrating comparable trends to standard commercial EMG electrodes. It was noted that the time and frequency response of the printed electrodes could be further enhanced by improving adhesion and reducing electrode‐to‐skin contact impedance.…”
Section: Sensor Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Undoubtedly, low-cost, scalable, patterned electrodes would unlock significant economic value for wearable products. Two printing methods, inkjet printing and screen printing, have widely been employed for fabricating thin, stretchable electrodes to avoid using expensive cleanroom techniques and reduce the overall fabrication complexity. Among the two printing methods, screen printing has an advantage in mass production since it is capable of printing out multiple arrays in a single step. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…USBLS highlights laborers and freight, stock, and material movers are the most vulnerable class to have musculoskeletal injuries where overexertion from repetitive action involving squatting and lifting creates fatigue in workers causing MSDs 1 . Recent developments of wearable robots show great potential 2,3 in assisting industry workers, and many wearable robots target walking, squatting 4 , and running [5][6][7] by reducing required physical efforts 8 to reduce industrial risks and support post-injury rehabilitation 9,10 . Because user interaction with a wearable robot is always diverse in actual use, it ultimately requires an efficient biofeedback system to adjust the wearable robot for each user's need, called personalized assistance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%