2011
DOI: 10.1101/gr.118992.110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prioritizing candidate disease genes by network-based boosting of genome-wide association data

Abstract: Network “guilt by association” (GBA) is a proven approach for identifying novel disease genes based on the observation that similar mutational phenotypes arise from functionally related genes. In principle, this approach could account even for nonadditive genetic interactions, which underlie the synergistic combinations of mutations often linked to complex diseases. Here, we analyze a large-scale, human gene functional interaction network (dubbed HumanNet). We show that candidate disease genes can be effective… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
620
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 671 publications
(635 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
4
620
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…28 Most GWASs list the nearest gene for the locus; however, mechanistic research indicates that the nearest gene is often not causal, and identification of GWAS targets remains difficult. 29,30 The expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) method has been developed to associate genetic variation with gene-expression changes. The method requires genotype-and tissue-specific gene-expression data from large numbers of healthy individuals and employs controlled computational methods to identify genotypedriven gene expression changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 Most GWASs list the nearest gene for the locus; however, mechanistic research indicates that the nearest gene is often not causal, and identification of GWAS targets remains difficult. 29,30 The expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) method has been developed to associate genetic variation with gene-expression changes. The method requires genotype-and tissue-specific gene-expression data from large numbers of healthy individuals and employs controlled computational methods to identify genotypedriven gene expression changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first tested MaxMIF's ability to differentiate drivers from passengers in six Pan‐Cancer datasets, namely, AWG, bcgsc, bcm, broad, ucsc, and wustl, provided by different research groups from the TCGA consortium (see the details in Table S1, Supporting Information), using two independently developed PPI networks HumanNet24 and STRINGv10 25. We compared the 12 prioritizing results with those obtained by DNmax and DNsum (two algorithms in MUFFINN)21 using the same data and the same five reference cancer gene sets, that is, CGC (Cancer Genome Census),26 CGCpointMut, Rule2020,5 HCD,27 and MouseMut28, 29 (see the Supporting Information for details), with CGC being the most well‐known and confident cancer gene set.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two independently developed PPI datasets HumanNet24 and STRINGv1025 were downloaded from their respective websites. Each of the interaction weight between two proteins was extracted and standardized with a value ranging from 0 to 1 and divided it by the largest weight.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We constructed a gene network from HumanNet 11 , a functional gene network where edges denote interactions between two genes. We constructed a smoothing graph by taking all edges from HumanNet, and producing a graph where all edge weights are set to 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%