Privacy by design

Wahlstrom, Kirsten; Ulhaq, Anwaar; Burmeister, Oliver

doi:10.3127/ajis.v24i0.2801

Cited by 15 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These were also deployed to aid the citizens to self-assess symptoms, monitor symptoms, track statistics, schedule doctor's appointments, and issue moving permits [17]. The role of privacy in information systems and technology design is well-established in almost all domains of ICT [18]. This includes health-related applications.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Originating as a concept in 1995 [29], coined by Cavoukian in 2011 [30], and formulated in the European Union (EU) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in 2016 [31], "privacy by design" became a gold standard in application development and systems engineering [32]. It encompasses seven fundamental principles directly injected into the solution, including transparency and the user's control of his or her data [18], [30], [32].…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Balancing privacy at the time of pandemic: global observation

Jordanoski

Ramos

Zaber

2023

IJPHS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The rapid outbreak of COVID-19 has initiated the development of mobile applications aiming at helping public health authorities to slow down viral diffusion. The proliferation of these applications engenders challenges to forge a balance between ‘public health utility’ and ‘personal privacy’. This paper scrutinizes various applications that collect personal data according to their functions and data protection compliance. These applications are mostly of three broader categories- contact tracing, self-assessment, and quarantine enforcement. We conduct systematic categorization based on five parameters-type of owner or provider, host platform, functionalities, the existence of privacy policy, and state of the source code. A total of 122 apps encompassing 83 countries were assessed during a research period of 20 days (June 1 to 20, 2020). Findings suggest that although the majority of the applications publish a privacy policy, many applications do not give information in detail, making the issue of privacy obscure. The majority of the applications collect various sensitive personal data irrespective of their functionalities, provider, and platform. Most applications are not open source raising concerns over trust and transparency. The findings are valuable to policymakers who are formulating short, mid, and long-term technology policies to strike a balance between functionality and personal privacy.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Balancing privacy at the time of pandemic: global observation

Jordanoski

Ramos

Zaber

2023

IJPHS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In response, Google removed several URLs from its search results. The right to be forgotten is a perpetual burden for companies and is considered very difficult in terms of implementation (WAHLSTROM et al, 2020).…”

Section: The Internet Of Things and Service And/or Inclusive Design: ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Privacidade por Definição e os aspectos de privacidade de dados pessoais no contexto do design inclusivo e de serviços

Oliveira¹,

Barbosa²,

Klein³

et al. 2022

DATJournal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Este artigo apresenta o resultado de um estudo que buscou identificar condutas, técnicas e boas práticas relacionadas à privacidade de dados, que podem ser incorporadas ao processo de design centrado no usuário, no âmbito do design de serviços e design inclusivo, utilizando a Internet das Coisas (IoT). É importante identificar novas diretrizes que possam ser incorporadas ao design de serviços e ao design inclusivo em virtude das novas legislações. Este estudo foi apoiado por uma Revisão Bibliográfica Sistemática, abrangendo 150 artigos em um período de 5 anos (2017-2021), nas bases de dados Web of Science, Scopus e no Portal de Periódicos da CAPES. Como resultado, traz uma lista de recomendações de boas práticas que podem ser adotadas em processos de design, especialmente para o modelo de Privacidade por Definição ou Privacy by Design (PbD).

show abstract

“…This is particularly problematic when fake news, trolling, and misinformation are a regular phenomenon across popular social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter [8]. Moreover, the integration of privacy-by-design [18] features in social media platforms such as pseudonymized or anonymized identity systems that enable users to control their digital identity access aggravates this problem further. While such platforms improve upon privacy violations, they pose traceability challenges, for example, in identifying users publishing fake content.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%