2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Privacy preserving optics for miniature vision sensors

Abstract: The next wave of micro and nano devices will create a world with trillions of small networked cameras. This will lead to increased concerns about privacy and security. Most privacy preserving algorithms for computer vision are applied after image/video data has been captured. We propose to use privacy preserving optics that filter or block sensitive information directly from the incident lightfield before sensor measurements are made, adding a new layer of privacy. In addition to balancing the privacy and util… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Machot et al [35] investigated on sensor data in order to discover unseen activities associated with human action recognition. Pittaluga and Koppal [36] used miniature vision sensors proposed privacy preserving optics to strike balance between utility of videos and privacy. It has many applications like motion tracking, depth sensing and blob detection.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machot et al [35] investigated on sensor data in order to discover unseen activities associated with human action recognition. Pittaluga and Koppal [36] used miniature vision sensors proposed privacy preserving optics to strike balance between utility of videos and privacy. It has many applications like motion tracking, depth sensing and blob detection.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, a set of identical mirror viewing directions, by with consecutively increasing concentric FOVs would keep increasing the value but would redundantly cover the same angular region. Our solution: We adapt a previous effort in computer vision for an optical knapsack algorithm [46] and present an attention knapsack algorithm that takes into account angular coverage by discretizing the field-of-view into β angular regions, each with a solid angle of π β . Our key idea, inspired from [46], is to create a binary array that keeps track of the overlap of each mirror viewing direction, and the update to this does not affect the overall running time of the algorithm.…”
Section: Feasible Fovea From the Attention Maskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our solution: We adapt a previous effort in computer vision for an optical knapsack algorithm [46] and present an attention knapsack algorithm that takes into account angular coverage by discretizing the field-of-view into β angular regions, each with a solid angle of π β . Our key idea, inspired from [46], is to create a binary array that keeps track of the overlap of each mirror viewing direction, and the update to this does not affect the overall running time of the algorithm. We call this array K(n, β) where K(i, b) = 1 if the corresponding mirror viewing direction covers this angle and is 0 if it does not.…”
Section: Feasible Fovea From the Attention Maskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultimately they determined that there is no 'one size fits all' solution for every scenario, and object size or security context can influence the optimal method. Pittaluga and Koppal [65] have implemented a similar blur-based privacy approach within the context of micro-scale image sensors. A hardware-based approach is used to add blur, as opposed to a software-based Gaussian blur.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%