2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.06.18.159699
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Private Antibody Repertoires Are Public

Abstract: When faced with a given pathogen, the antibody response generally functions similarly across different people, 1-4 but the source of this similarity has been unclear. One hypothesis was that people share a high proportion of the same VDJ-recombined antibody genes, but this has been disproven. 5,6 An alternative is that people share a high proportion of functionally similar antibodies, 7,8 but testing this hypothesis requires a method for measuring functional similarity that scales to the millions of antibodies… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, given that individuals' naive repertoires typically share very few clonotypes [11,26] and yet are often found to respond to similar 'immunodominant' epitopes, it follows that multiple evolutionary routes may lead from low-moderate affinity naive BCRs to high affinity antibodies against the same antigen surface region. This is supported by statistical arguments showing the implausability of a purely "random repertoire" for an efficient immune response [25,27]. Epitope immunodominance could be rationalised via the existence of a more 'public' set of backbone structures in the BCR repertoire and the concept that BCRs with similar topologies and sufficient chemical complementarity engage the same epitope [24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Furthermore, given that individuals' naive repertoires typically share very few clonotypes [11,26] and yet are often found to respond to similar 'immunodominant' epitopes, it follows that multiple evolutionary routes may lead from low-moderate affinity naive BCRs to high affinity antibodies against the same antigen surface region. This is supported by statistical arguments showing the implausability of a purely "random repertoire" for an efficient immune response [25,27]. Epitope immunodominance could be rationalised via the existence of a more 'public' set of backbone structures in the BCR repertoire and the concept that BCRs with similar topologies and sufficient chemical complementarity engage the same epitope [24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Extraordinarily, for both IGH and TRB, the number of classes in the entire sampled population was not substantially larger than that in a single young, healthy individual. This result implies that the private repertoire is functionally public and that classes hold additional useful patterns, which future studies may reveal ( 18, 60–62 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In addition, different algorithm choices as well as code optimizations can be explored to maximize the utility of ENRICH while minimizing time and computational load. Quantitative measures of similarity have been shown to add useful insights in other fields 37,38 . ENRICHment, in various forms, is expected to be a useful new avenue for decreasing labeling burden and speeding iterative training and testing of DL models in development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%