2017
DOI: 10.1123/jlas.2016-0014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Privilege Over Innovation: Sports Broadcasting, Mobile Television, and the Case of Aereo

Abstract: Despite the advent of digital and mobile technologies, major leagues and television networks continue to enjoy significant control over the distribution of popular sports content. Leagues have long enjoyed an antitrust exemption via the Sports Broadcasting Act when it comes to negotiating pooled coverage rights with broadcasters. This paper argues that leagues leverage this competitive advantage to thwart technological innovation. Our case is demonstrated by an examination of how Aereo-a startup technology com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This fact has significant consequences for the organisations and individuals who play, watch, and profit from sporting competition and spectacle as well as for those who study them. As it stands, this significance is acknowledged in different ways in the existing literature, with varying aspects of mobile technologies, practices, and policies examined by a modest number of largely disconnected scholars (e.g., Agur, 2015; Benigni et al, 2014; Boyle, 2004; Byrne, 2011; Dittmore & Hutchins, 2017; Evers, 2014, 2015; Evens et al, 2011; Goggin, 2013; Humphreys & Finlay, 2008; Hutchins, 2014, 2016a, 2016b; Hutchins & Boyle, 2017; Hutchins & Sanderson, 2017; Kang, 2015, 2017; Kretzchmar, 2008; Watkins & Lewis, 2014). Consideration of mobile media is also regularly folded into broader analyses of media sport activities, markets, events, and practices, involving intermittent or synoptic treatment of mobile technologies and wireless communications networks (e.g., Billings et al, 2017a; Evens, Iosifidis, & Smith, 2013; Galily, 2014; Gantz & Lewis, 2014; Hutchins, 2016c; Hutchins & Rowe, 2012; Miah, 2017; Rowe, 2011, 2014; Tamir, 2016; Thorpe, 2014, 2017; Toffoletti, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fact has significant consequences for the organisations and individuals who play, watch, and profit from sporting competition and spectacle as well as for those who study them. As it stands, this significance is acknowledged in different ways in the existing literature, with varying aspects of mobile technologies, practices, and policies examined by a modest number of largely disconnected scholars (e.g., Agur, 2015; Benigni et al, 2014; Boyle, 2004; Byrne, 2011; Dittmore & Hutchins, 2017; Evers, 2014, 2015; Evens et al, 2011; Goggin, 2013; Humphreys & Finlay, 2008; Hutchins, 2014, 2016a, 2016b; Hutchins & Boyle, 2017; Hutchins & Sanderson, 2017; Kang, 2015, 2017; Kretzchmar, 2008; Watkins & Lewis, 2014). Consideration of mobile media is also regularly folded into broader analyses of media sport activities, markets, events, and practices, involving intermittent or synoptic treatment of mobile technologies and wireless communications networks (e.g., Billings et al, 2017a; Evens, Iosifidis, & Smith, 2013; Galily, 2014; Gantz & Lewis, 2014; Hutchins, 2016c; Hutchins & Rowe, 2012; Miah, 2017; Rowe, 2011, 2014; Tamir, 2016; Thorpe, 2014, 2017; Toffoletti, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%