2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cyto.2016.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pro-inflammatory chemokines CCL2, chemerin, IP-10 and RANTES in human serum during an oral lipid tolerance test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…20 In humans, short-term high dose LA consumption reduced circulating pro-inflammatory cytokine levels. 21 However, we did not detect an association between plasma LA levels and markers of tumor necrosis factor pathway activation. For AA, there is firm evidence for a pro-inflammatory effect, 6 and we found a positive association with GDF-15 levels.…”
Section: Inflammation Lipid and Glucose Metabolismcontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…20 In humans, short-term high dose LA consumption reduced circulating pro-inflammatory cytokine levels. 21 However, we did not detect an association between plasma LA levels and markers of tumor necrosis factor pathway activation. For AA, there is firm evidence for a pro-inflammatory effect, 6 and we found a positive association with GDF-15 levels.…”
Section: Inflammation Lipid and Glucose Metabolismcontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…A significant reduction of circulating IP-10 concentration was observed as a consequence of triglyceride ingestion [71]. In our study, IP10 gene expression negatively correlated with T2D and dyslipidemia parameters.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…It is worth noting that postprandial levels of triglyceride can be affected by many factors, for example, type of diet, time after a meal, and comorbidity. Therefore, an oral lipid tolerance test, 28 similar to the oral glucose tolerance test, is expected to have higher clinical significance compared to a random nonfasting triglyceride test. This hypothesis needs to be investigated in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%