2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.07.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic assessment of creep-fatigue crack propagation in austenitic stainless steel cracked plates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen from specimens 8 and 13 and specimens 9, 14, and 15 that obvious scatter of creep data exists. The origin of the scatter comes from many sources, such as the fluctuation of test conditions, surface roughness, grain size, and inhomogeneous microstructure 36,37 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be seen from specimens 8 and 13 and specimens 9, 14, and 15 that obvious scatter of creep data exists. The origin of the scatter comes from many sources, such as the fluctuation of test conditions, surface roughness, grain size, and inhomogeneous microstructure 36,37 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The origin of the scatter comes from many sources, such as the fluctuation of test conditions, surface roughness, grain size, and inhomogeneous microstructure. 36,37 The SEM fracture appearances of creep ruptured specimens at 600 C and 650 C under different stress levels are shown in Figures 2 and 3, respectively. Typical intergranular brittle fracture and transgranular ductile fracture are observed from the SEM images.…”
Section: Creep Behavior Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uncertainty emanates from a variety of sources including the uncertainties of test-, service-, and material-condition that can be exacerbated by geometric factors (GD&T), test procedure, and operator error. [1][2][3] These uncertainties aggregate over time to have a life-limiting effect on components. Typical creep-damage models are deterministic and employ safety factors to achieve conservatism.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be seen from specimens 8, 13, and specimens 9, 14, 15 that obvious scatter of creep data exists. The origin of the scatter comes from many sources, such as the fluctuation of test conditions, surface roughness, grain size and inhomogeneous microstructure 41,42 . The SEM fracture appearances of creep ruptured specimens at 600 and 650 under different stress levels are shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3, respectively.…”
Section: Creep Behavior Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%