2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.08.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic association learning in schizophrenia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Caudate abnormalities are fairly well established in schizophrenia, in terms of smaller volume in first episode drug-naive patients (Ebdrup et al, 2010), altered hemispheric specialization of functional connectivity (Mueller, Wang, Pan, Holt, & Liu, 2015), and abnormal fronto-striatal connectivity (Salvador et al, 2010). In addition, striatal dysfunction has been associated with deficits in learning in schizophrenia, including probabilistic association learning (Weickert, 2018) and procedural learning (Adini et al, 2015). Our findings add to this literature by suggesting that recruitment of the caudate during instruction learning is abnormal in schizophrenia, possibly leading to downstream effects reflected in impaired task performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Caudate abnormalities are fairly well established in schizophrenia, in terms of smaller volume in first episode drug-naive patients (Ebdrup et al, 2010), altered hemispheric specialization of functional connectivity (Mueller, Wang, Pan, Holt, & Liu, 2015), and abnormal fronto-striatal connectivity (Salvador et al, 2010). In addition, striatal dysfunction has been associated with deficits in learning in schizophrenia, including probabilistic association learning (Weickert, 2018) and procedural learning (Adini et al, 2015). Our findings add to this literature by suggesting that recruitment of the caudate during instruction learning is abnormal in schizophrenia, possibly leading to downstream effects reflected in impaired task performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%