2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2016.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic energy forecasting: Global Energy Forecasting Competition 2014 and beyond

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
395
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 755 publications
(428 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
395
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In [4] it is indicated that a usual feature of renewable energy is that the output of power plants largely depends on weather conditions. Thus, the integration of knowledge or data about weather could benefit the time series modelling process to provide an accurate forecast instead of a unique approach with one single value corresponding to the consumption data [17,33].…”
Section: Narx Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [4] it is indicated that a usual feature of renewable energy is that the output of power plants largely depends on weather conditions. Thus, the integration of knowledge or data about weather could benefit the time series modelling process to provide an accurate forecast instead of a unique approach with one single value corresponding to the consumption data [17,33].…”
Section: Narx Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• nine variants of three parsimonious autoregressive model structures with exogenous variables (ARX): one originally proposed by Misiorek et al [19] and later used in a number of EPF studies [13,18,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27], one which evolved from it during the successful participation of TEAM POLAND in the Global Energy Forecasting Competition 2014 (GEFCom2014; see [28][29][30]) and an extension of the former, which creates a stronger link with yesterday's prices and additionally considers a second exogenous variable (zonal load or wind power), • three two-year long, hourly resolution test periods from three distinct power markets (GEFCom2014, Nord Pool and the U.K.), • nine variants of five classes of selection and shrinkage procedures: single-step elimination of insignificant predictors (without or with constraints), stepwise regression (with forward selection or backward elimination), ridge regression, lasso and three elastic nets (with α = 0.25, 0.5 or 0.75), • model validation in terms of the robust weekly-weighted mean absolute error (WMAE; see [1]) and the Diebold-Mariano (DM; see [31]) test and draw statistically-significant conclusions of high practical value. The remainder of the paper is structured as follows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will split the data using the following approach: 1) train from 2012-06-01 to 2013-05-31; 2) validation from 2013-06-01 to 2014-05-31; 3) test from 2014-06-01 to 2014-07-01. The complete dataset is accessible via [8].…”
Section: Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test the usefulness of this new framework, experiments using datasets from the American Meteorological Society (AMS), solar radiation prediction contest [7] and from the 2014 Global Energy Forecasting Competition (GEFCom2014) [8] are carried out. The goal of these contests is to achieve the best short term predictions and the best probabilistic distribution, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%