Probabilistic measures of coherence: from adequacy constraints towards pluralism

Coherence and Deontology

“…There are other problems of detail with each of the measures that has been devised so far, but those problems have been successfully identified already in the literature (see, e.g., Schippers for a survey of those problems), and I won't review them here. But, by way of summarizing my conclusion from those problems of detail, I will say this: If the post‐Gettier literature provides the materials for a strong inductive argument against a reductive account of knowledge as JTB plus some fourth condition, then the literature of the last two decades provides the materials for a strong inductive argument against a formal measure of coherence that applies to sets of propositions.…”

A Remark on Probabilistic Measures of Coherence

“…Thus, 1 is a neutral point with respect to the degree of coherence. A value of the function which is greater than 1 indicates that the set of propositions is coherent, 1 See also Glass [10], Meijs [17], Schupbach [23], Roche [21], Schippers [22] and Koscholke [13]. and a value of the function between 0 (included) and 1 (not included) indicates that the set is incoherent.…”

Matrix-vector algorithms for normalizing factors in algebraic Bayesian networks local posteriori inference

“…Возможность систематического использования интервальных оценок вероятностей в ВГМ существенна для таких актуальных открытых вопросов их теории, как, например, обработка изначально несогласованных сведений [3,4,18], алгоритмизация автоматического обучения [4,19,20].…”