Probabilistic Modelling for Estimating Gas Kinetics and Decompression Sickness Risk in Pigs During H2 Biochemical Decompression

Abstract

We modelled the kinetics of H 2 flux during gas uptake and elimination in conscious pigs exposed to hyperbaric H 2 . The model used a physiological description of gas flux fitted to the observed decompression sickness (DCS) incidence in two groups of pigs: untreated controls, and animals that had received intestinal injections of H 2 -metabolizing microbes that biochemically eliminated some of the H 2 stored in the pigs' tissues. To analyse H 2 flux during gas uptake, animals were compressed in a dry chamber to 24 atm (ca 88% H 2 , 9% He, 2% O 2 , 1% N 2 ) for 30-1440 min and decompressed at 0.9 atm min −1 (n = 70). To analyse H 2 flux during gas elimination, animals were compressed to 24 atm for 3 h and decompressed at 0.45-1.8 atm min −1 (n = 58). Animals were closely monitored for 1 h postdecompression for signs of DCS. Probabilistic modelling was used to estimate that the exponential time constant during H 2 uptake (τ in ) and H 2 elimination (τ out ) were 79 ± 25 min and 0.76 ± 0.14 min, respectively. Thus, the gas kinetics affecting DCS risk appeared to be substantially faster for elimination than uptake, which is contrary to customary assumptions of gas uptake and elimination kinetic symmetry. We discuss the possible reasons for this asymmetry, and why absolute values of H 2 kinetics cannot be obtained with this approach. Published by

Could beaked whales get the bends?

“…3C) resulting in an end-dive P N 2 of 1.96 ATA. This is still a high saturation partial pressure, but because of the sigmoidal shape of the DCS risk curve against saturation pressure (Dromsky et al, 2000), small changes in inert gas load (5%) result in large changes in DCS risk (50%, Fahlman et al, 2001;Fahlman and Kayar, 2003).…”

“…Decompression sickness research on terrestrial mammals shows a distinct relationship between ascent rate and DCS risk (Flynn and Lambertsen, 1971;Fahlman and Kayar, 2003). In the mouse, the decompression rate from 13.8 ATA to 1 ATA resulting in a 50% DCS was ~ 0.58…”

Allometric scaling of decompression sickness risk in terrestrial mammals; cardiac output explains risk of decompression sickness

“…The tissue time constant provides information about the removal rate of inert gas. While this parameter is a theoretical construct 6 31 , it offers information about the physiological basis of DCS, and allows general predictions how risk may scale between species. First, due to the low solubility of N 2 in tissues and blood, it is generally assumed that N 2 removal is perfusion-limited 9 .…”

How Do Marine Mammals Manage and Usually Avoid Gas Emboli Formation and Gas Embolic Pathology? Critical Clues From Studies of Wild Dolphins

“…As metabolic rate and blood flow, and thereby gas uptake or removal, correlate with body mass, it has been suggested that this variation in risk among species is mainly due to variation in cardiac output (Fahlman, 2017). The importance of blood flow to alter risk may also explain other proposed risk factors such as exercise, adiposity, age, and sex (Robertson, 1992;Broome et al, 1994Broome et al, , 1995Vann et al, 2011), but among these, body mass is the only risk factor without conflicting results (Berghage et al, 1979;Fahlman et al, 2001;Lillo et al, 2002;Fahlman and Kayar, 2003;Fahlman, 2017).…”