2022
DOI: 10.1029/2022sw003064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic Prediction of Dst Storms One‐Day‐Ahead Using Full‐Disk SoHO Images

Abstract: We present a new model for the probability that the disturbance storm time (Dst) index exceeds −100 nT, with a lead time between 1 and 3 days. Dst provides essential information about the strength of the ring current around the Earth caused by the protons and electrons from the solar wind, and it is routinely used as a proxy for geomagnetic storms. The model is developed using an ensemble of Convolutional Neural Networks that are trained using Solar and Heliospheric Observatory (SoHO) images (Michelson Doppler… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Training the model with imbalanced EIC data, the mean square error (MSE) and a focal loss (L4) are utilized as loss functions to be minimized, for comparatively studying the improvement of the imbalanced regression by different loss functions. Many other machine learning models dealt with the imbalance problem by manually selecting only extreme events to improve the performance, for example, (Hu et al., 2023; Ren et al., 2023). We avoid providing such a priori knowledge to the predictive model, such that our model is robust to provide continuous predictions/forecasts in the real operational environment.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Training the model with imbalanced EIC data, the mean square error (MSE) and a focal loss (L4) are utilized as loss functions to be minimized, for comparatively studying the improvement of the imbalanced regression by different loss functions. Many other machine learning models dealt with the imbalance problem by manually selecting only extreme events to improve the performance, for example, (Hu et al., 2023; Ren et al., 2023). We avoid providing such a priori knowledge to the predictive model, such that our model is robust to provide continuous predictions/forecasts in the real operational environment.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Machine Learning (ML) and artificial intelligence has shown promising results in M‐I‐T system modeling (Blandin et al., 2022; Bristow et al., 2022; Gowtam et al., 2019; Hu et al., 2022; Kunduri et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2020; McGranaghan et al., 2021; Pinto et al., 2022; Sai Gowtam & Tulasi Ram, 2017; Tulasi Ram et al., 2018 and references therein). The ML models require large data sets to learn the relationship between inputs and outputs through systematic learning processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, applications are concerned with two temporal windows of the descent phase of Solar Cycle 24, comprising the "San Patrick's Storm" that occurred in March 2015 (Astafyeva et al, 2015;Nayak et al, 2016;Wu et al, 2016), the storm in June 2015 (Joshi et al, 2018;Vemareddy, 2017), and the September 2017 storm (Guastavino et al, 2019;Qian et al, 2019;Benvenuto et al, 2020). Furthermore, we assessed the prediction accuracy by using both standard skill scores like the true skill statistic (TSS), the Heidke Skill Score (HSS), and the valueweighted skill scores introduced by Guastavino et al (2022b), which better account for the intrinsic dynamic nature of forecasting problems (Guastavino et al, 2021;Hu et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%