2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnt.2013.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic properties of number fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But we require zero-free regions for Dedekind zeta functions of Galois fields, and these correspond (in some cases conjecturally) to automorphic L-functions that are not cuspidal. This restriction of [KM02] to the cuspidal case has been a significant barrier in many previous applications (such as an effective prime ideal theorem in [CK14], or [CK13]; see Remark 5.9). We expect that our new approach to proving density results for zeroes in a family of noncuspidal L-functions will have many further applications.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But we require zero-free regions for Dedekind zeta functions of Galois fields, and these correspond (in some cases conjecturally) to automorphic L-functions that are not cuspidal. This restriction of [KM02] to the cuspidal case has been a significant barrier in many previous applications (such as an effective prime ideal theorem in [CK14], or [CK13]; see Remark 5.9). We expect that our new approach to proving density results for zeroes in a family of noncuspidal L-functions will have many further applications.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A technical barrier in previous applications of the Kowalski-Michel result (such as an effective prime ideal threom in [CK14] and e.g. several related works [CK13]) is that it applies to a family of cuspidal automorphic L-functions, whereas the L-functions we encounter when studying normal extensions L/Q will typically factor into many Artin L-functions. One significant novelty of our present work is that we develop a general framework (sketched in §1.5) in which we may apply the Kowalski-Michel result to families of non-cuspidal automorphic L-functions with much more flexibility than has been achieved before.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general when considering the set of Dedekind zeta functions ζ F obtained from a set of fields F ∈ Z n (Q, G; X), we may encounter the possibility that two fields F and F are distinct, yet ζ F = ζ F ; in this case F and F are said to be arithmetically equivalent. But this concern only arises in the non-Galois setting (see for example the situation encountered in [CK13]). Arithmetically equivalent fields share the same discriminant, signature, maximal normal subfield, number of roots of unity, and most importantly for our work, the same Galois closure (see for example [BdS02]).…”
Section: Now For Each Choice Of Z Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we show that when L(s, ρ) has a certain zero-free region, the value log L(1, ρ) is determined by a short sum. 1 In [2], we used the Greek letter γ in place of κ. However, γ is taken for the Euler-Mascheroni constant in this article.…”
Section: Formula For L(1 ρ) Under a Certain Zero-free Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof of (1•1) is given in Section 3 since at least the upper bound is well known but it is hard to find its proof in the literature. As in the quadratic extension case, we may conjecture that (1 + o (1))(e γ log log |D K |) d and (1 + o(1)) ζ(d+1) e γ log log |D K | are the true upper and lower bounds, resp. In this paper, we show that it is the case except for a density zero set in a family of number fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%