Probabilitas Mekanisme Small Claim Court Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Waris Di Pengadilan Agama / Probability of Small Claim Court Mechanism in Resolving Inheritance Disputes in Religious Court

Abstract

ABSTRAKHukum acara formil yang berlaku di Pengadilan Agama dalam menyelesaikan sengketa waris relatif memakan waktu yang cukup lama. Hal ini mengakibatkan waktu serta biaya yang dikeluarkan menjadi lebih besar. Mekanisme small claim court yang diatur oleh Mahkamah Agung melalui PERMA No. 2 tahun 2015 tentang tata cara penyelesaian sengketa sederhana dalam sistem peradilan umum menjadi titik terang. Konsep small claim court tersebut diharapkan dapat diaplikasikan dalam sistem peradilan agama sehingga mampu memangkas waktu yang lama dalam penyelesaian sengketa waris di Pengadilan Agama. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menawarkan terobosan baru dalam sistem peradilan agama di Indonesia khususnya terkait penyelesaian sengketa waris. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundangundangan dan konseptual dengan menggunakan studi kepustakaan sebagai alat analisis bahan hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penyelesaian sengketa waris di Pengadilan Agama dengan konsep small claim court dipandang mungkin untuk diimplementasikan sebagai bagian dari pembaharuan hukum acara peradilan agama. Namun demikian, hal itu perlu diiringi dengan pengklasifikasian perkara waris ke dalam perkara besar dan kecil dilihat dari nilai harta warisan yang disengketakan. Oleh karenanya, perluasan pengaturan mekanisme small claim court ke dalam sistem peradilan agama menjadi penting guna memangkas mekanisme penyelesaian perkara yang terlalu lama. Kata kunci: probabilitas; small claim court; waris;Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, Volume 7 Nomor 3, November 2018 : 387 -404 388 ABSTRAKThe formal procedural law that applies in the Religious Courts in resolving inheritance disputes takes a relatively long time. This results in greater time and costs. The small claim court mechanism regulated by the Supreme Court through Supreme Court Regulation No. 2 of 2015 concerning the procedure for resolving simple disputes in the general justice system to become a bright spot. The concept of small claim court is expected to be applied in the religious justice system so that it can cut down the long time in resolving inheritance disputes in the Religious Courts. This study aims to offer a new breakthrough in the system of religious justice in Indonesia, especially in relation to the resolving of inheritance disputes. This research is a normative juridical research with a law and conceptual approach by using literature study as a legal material analysis tool. The results showed that the resolving of dispute of inheritance in the Religious Court with the small claim court concept was considered possible to be implemented as part of the renewal of the religious court procedural law. However, this needs to be accompanied by the classification of inheritance cases into large and small cases seen from the value of the disputed inheritance. Therefore, the expansion of the small claim court mechanism into the religious justice system is deemed necessary in order to reduce the mechanism for resolving cases that are too long.

Dispute Resolution through Mediation in Endowments Cases in the Legal Effectiveness Theoretical Perspective

“…Meanwhile, the community has its own pattern in the resolution of endowment disputes based on Islamic law. Islamic law explains that the resolution of endowment disputes is carried out through deliberations towards peace, mediation and judicial judges 12,13 . The pattern used comes from the practice of Islamic scholars (in the organization of PPAIW) in the resolution of endowment disputes.…”

Procedures for Completing Small Claims Lawsuit of Civil Cases in District Court in Indonesia

“…Article 1 paragraph (1) Perma No. 2 of 2015 states that a small claim is a procedure for examining in a court case against a civil lawsuit against an unlawful act with a maximum material claim of Rp 200 million which is settled by small procedure and verification (Rohman & Sugeng, 2018). In addition, this small claim is examined and decided by a single judge within the scope of public court authority (Afriana, 2017).…”