2014 19th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icdsp.2014.6900696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probability distribution estimation of music signals in time and frequency domains

Abstract: This paper attempts to estimate the probability distribution of music signals. A number of music signals belonging to different genres of music have been analyzed. Four well known speech distributions viz. Gaussian, Generalized Gamma, Laplacian and Cauchy have been tested as hypotheses. The distribution estimation has been carried out in time and Discrete-Cosine-Transform (DCT) domains. It was observed that skewed Laplacian distribution describes the music samples most accurately with the peakedness of the dis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure (2), the mean value (µ )have the highest value ,while the other elements (µ − 𝜎, µ − 2𝜎, µ + 𝜎, µ + 2𝜎) have smallest value,so its weight will be small depending on the value of Gaussian function, so the features will be selected in more suitable manner by giving the mean value the highest weight and the weight is decreased as moving from the mean according to the significance of the statistics, as shown in Figure 2, ( µ + 𝜎) and µ − 𝜎) have weight smaller than µ , also ( µ + 2𝜎) and µ − 2𝜎) have lowest values, this can increase the obtained information from using the mean only. The other contributions of this method (GWT) is proposed feature selection method based on statistics of each pool as described in the different Gaussian function in Figure 2, which is described the differences between there different Gaussian function values according to µ 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝜎 [24][25][26].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure (2), the mean value (µ )have the highest value ,while the other elements (µ − 𝜎, µ − 2𝜎, µ + 𝜎, µ + 2𝜎) have smallest value,so its weight will be small depending on the value of Gaussian function, so the features will be selected in more suitable manner by giving the mean value the highest weight and the weight is decreased as moving from the mean according to the significance of the statistics, as shown in Figure 2, ( µ + 𝜎) and µ − 𝜎) have weight smaller than µ , also ( µ + 2𝜎) and µ − 2𝜎) have lowest values, this can increase the obtained information from using the mean only. The other contributions of this method (GWT) is proposed feature selection method based on statistics of each pool as described in the different Gaussian function in Figure 2, which is described the differences between there different Gaussian function values according to µ 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝜎 [24][25][26].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with possible values lying within the interval [0; 1] and values close to zero corresponding to unclipped signal. More detailed information on features of parameter (2) can be found in [11] and some known speech distributions have been tested as hypotheses for different genres of music in [12]. As can be seen, 4 = 1 √ 4 ⁄ = 2 √ 4 ⁄ is signal variance normalized by the square root of the fourthorder central moment.…”
Section: Some Features Of Studied Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 In such applications, one can expect that output of an unknown FIR system includes acoustic signals with a positive kurtosis such as human conversation, music or spike noise, that is, so called super-Gaussian acoustic signals. [10][11][12] It is especially important to assume such conditions in acoustic echo cancellers; it is pointed out that estimation of system coefficients becomes problematic when noise contaminates output of an unknown FIR system, and SNR (Signal to Noise Ratio) declines substantially. 13 In addition, most methods of FIR system identification deal only with unknown coefficients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actual use of FIR system identification pertains to the field of acoustic signal processing such as acoustic echo cancellation and active noise control . In such applications, one can expect that output of an unknown FIR system includes acoustic signals with a positive kurtosis such as human conversation, music or spike noise, that is, so called super‐Gaussian acoustic signals . It is especially important to assume such conditions in acoustic echo cancellers; it is pointed out that estimation of system coefficients becomes problematic when noise contaminates output of an unknown FIR system, and SNR (Signal to Noise Ratio) declines substantially .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%