2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2020.104554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing 4-(diethylamino)-salicylaldehyde-based thiosemicarbazones as multi-target directed ligands against cholinesterases, carbonic anhydrases and α-glycosidase enzymes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In parallel, thiosemicarbazones also display a wide plethora of biological properties ranging from anticancer, anti-bacterial, anti-tumor, anti-protozoal, anti-fungal, anti-leishmanial, and antiviral activities [29][30][31][32][33][34]. Thiosemicarbazone derivatives have also been employed as NDRG1 up-regulators, cathepsin inhibitors, and cholinesterase inhibitors for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease [35][36][37][38]. Figure 1 represents illustrative examples of commercial drugs for AD therapy and importance of quinoline as well as thiosemicarbazone in medicinal/pharmaceutical chemistry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In parallel, thiosemicarbazones also display a wide plethora of biological properties ranging from anticancer, anti-bacterial, anti-tumor, anti-protozoal, anti-fungal, anti-leishmanial, and antiviral activities [29][30][31][32][33][34]. Thiosemicarbazone derivatives have also been employed as NDRG1 up-regulators, cathepsin inhibitors, and cholinesterase inhibitors for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease [35][36][37][38]. Figure 1 represents illustrative examples of commercial drugs for AD therapy and importance of quinoline as well as thiosemicarbazone in medicinal/pharmaceutical chemistry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results show that EEFO as a crude extract exhibited efficient α-glycosidase and α-amylase inhibition effect than that of acarbose, which had IC50 of 10.00 μM for α-amylase, 22.80 μM for a-glucosidase. The results clearly showed that EEFO had more effective inhibition than that of acarbose, which was a starch blocker [77].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The results show that EESB as a crude extract exhibited efficient both digestive inhibition effects than acarbose, which had IC 50 of 10.00 mmol/L for α-amylase, 22.80 mmol/L for α-glycosidase. The results showed that EESB had more effective inhibition than that of acarbose as a starch blocker [81].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%