2011
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.84.063403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing dielectric-response effects with attosecond time-resolved streaked photoelectron spectroscopy of metal surfaces

Abstract: The release of conduction-band electrons from a metal surface by a subfemtosecond extreme ultraviolet (XUV) pulse and their propagation through the solid provoke a dielectric response in the solid that acts back on the photoelectron wave packet. We calculated the (wake) potential associated with this photoelectron self-interaction in terms of bulk and surface plasmon excitations and show that it induces a considerable, XUV-frequencydependent temporal shift in laser-streaked XUV photoemission spectra, suggestin… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This yields an additional delay, since the normal field component is screened over very short depths (in the range 0–0.3 nm for Mg (ref. 31 )) at the surface, meaning that photoemitted electrons do not experience the streaking field until they reach the surface—which typically takes on the order of tens to hundreds of attoseconds 30 32 33 34 . In our case, however, photoelectrons from the nanotaper probe the electric field component parallel to the surface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This yields an additional delay, since the normal field component is screened over very short depths (in the range 0–0.3 nm for Mg (ref. 31 )) at the surface, meaning that photoemitted electrons do not experience the streaking field until they reach the surface—which typically takes on the order of tens to hundreds of attoseconds 30 32 33 34 . In our case, however, photoelectrons from the nanotaper probe the electric field component parallel to the surface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2.13)]. The one-electron photoelectron spectrum , thus, includes a multitude of many-body effects (Zhang and Thumm, 2011b;Echenique et al, 1981) such as corehole screening (Canright, 1988;Huber et al, 2001) and relaxation, particle-hole and plasmon excitation. To identify and disentangle those processes, an alternative "three-step-model" (or "multi-step-model") of photoemission (Feibelman and Eastman, 1974) is frequently employed in which the response of the full many-body state |Ψ ( −1) ⟩ is reduced to few active degrees of freedom with which the outgoing photoelectron interacts.…”
Section: Time-resolved Photoemission From Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feasibility of investigating photoemission in condensed matter with attosecond resolution, and the significant time delay observed in the first proof-of-principle experiment on W(110), prompted several theoretical studies of the phenomenon [15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. In the absence of a first-principles description, which is very challenging, one had to resort to simplified approaches that yielded quite contradictory predictions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%