“…For noncharged polymers under nanoconfinement, several physical characteristics have also been observed to change compared to bulk including the dynamic glass transition temperature ( T g ), self-diffusivity, dielectric relaxation strength, conformational entropy, and molecular packing density. ,− Similarly, these structural and dynamical effects that are observed under nanoconfinement have also been observed in pressure-dependent studies of noncharged polymer systems. ,− Additionally, in situ free radical polymerization within anodized aluminum oxide (AAO) nanopores have resulted in an increase in reaction kinetics with the resulting polymers exhibiting a narrower molecular weight distribution compared to those prepared under similar reaction conditions in bulk. , For bulk polyILs, experimental and computational studies have shown that when the ion conduction is dominated by hopping of ions along the polymer backbone corresponding to faster dynamics compared to hopping from chain to chain in an entangled system. ,, Thus, if nanoscale confinement can lead to favorable alignment of chains as seen in noncharged polymers, then higher ionic conductivity may result in polyILs. However, very few studies have examined the effects of surface interactions and confinement on the properties of polyILs. ,, …”