2020
DOI: 10.22331/q-2020-10-15-343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing nonclassicality with matrices of phase-space distributions

Abstract: We devise a method to certify nonclassical features via correlations of phase-space distributions by unifying the notions of quasiprobabilities and matrices of correlation functions. Our approach complements and extends recent results that were based on Chebyshev's integral inequality \cite{BA19}. The method developed here correlates arbitrary phase-space functions at arbitrary points in phase space, including multimode scenarios and higher-order correlations. Furthermore, our approach provides necessary and s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
(161 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And where the equations were specifically states for qudit states, general expressions can be found to calculate these values for SU(N) structures of even continuous‐variable systems. Further to these measures there are other ways in which phase‐space methods have been useful to characterize a quantum state, these are: measures of coherence [ 100,101 ] ; phase‐space inequalities [ 102–105 ] ; and the negativity in the Wigner function, which plays an important role. The manifestation of these negative values provide nuanced details for each system.…”
Section: Quantum Technologies In Phase Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…And where the equations were specifically states for qudit states, general expressions can be found to calculate these values for SU(N) structures of even continuous‐variable systems. Further to these measures there are other ways in which phase‐space methods have been useful to characterize a quantum state, these are: measures of coherence [ 100,101 ] ; phase‐space inequalities [ 102–105 ] ; and the negativity in the Wigner function, which plays an important role. The manifestation of these negative values provide nuanced details for each system.…”
Section: Quantum Technologies In Phase Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A different approach is nonclassicality certification via negativities of reconstructed quasiprobabilities [23] (in particular, the Glauber-Sudarshan P function [24] and the Wigner function [25][26][27][28]). Methods that involve regularizations of quasiprobabilities have been implemented for the singlemode and multimode scenarios [29,30], and more recently, phase-space inequalities have been proposed and tested experimentally [31][32][33]. In order to guarantee for negativities with a high statistical significance, the collected experimental data has to be postprocessed after the experiment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, building on a recently proposed phasespace inequality [15][16][17], we drive a nonclassicality witness for kernel functions. We use our proposed witness * farid.ghobadi80@gmail.com to show that the nonclassical kernel leads to better separation of data points in feature space.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of working with P distribution, it is more convenient to work with quasiprobability distributions such as the Wigner function, which are non-singular and experimentally accessible [25]. In this paper, we are especially interested in the following inequality, which holds for classical states [15,16]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation